1.Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004): This is a film about how precious our memories are and how we should savor them while we can because our minds erase them gradually over time on their own anyway.
2. Zodiac (2007): David Fincher’s films have often been criticized for their lack of characterization and emotional detachment but this is not the case with Zodiac. The actors go a long way in providing an emotional connection to their characters. This is a film that shows people talking and doing research – hardly, dynamic, cinematic material but Fincher makes it fascinating with strong performances from his talented cast and a solid screenplay to anchor the film.
3. Mulholland Drive (2001): David Lynch's atmospheric ode to memory and the cutthroat nature of Hollywood all held together by a neo-noir tale of mystery with a blisteringly fierce performance by Naomi Watts. This film runs the gamut of emotions, from humorous gags to heartwrenching emotion to moments of absolute horror.
4. In the Mood for Love (2000): Wong Kar-Wai's atmospheric love letter to Hong Kong in the 1960s features an aching romance from afar between two lonely souls trapped by the attitudes and customs of the times in which they live in. Every frame of this film is gorgeous to look at and the two leads have undeniable chemistry.
5. There Will Be Blood (2007): This film is really a story about how the United States was built – with hard work, sweat, and, yes, blood. Paul Thomas Anderson has crafted a cinematic masterpiece that pits the beginnings of corporate greed against religious extremism with a deliciously over-the-top performance by Daniel Day-Lewis at its center.
6. Che (2008): Steven Soderbergh made a $60 million epic that eschewed mainstream accessibility in favor of telling the rise and fall of controversial revolutionary Che Guevara. Resisting the urge to sentimentalize the man, instead Soderbergh presents an absorbing look at how Che's guerrilla warfare worked in Cuba and failed in Bolivia. Benicio del Toro, in a role he was born to play, delivers an incredible performance in this film.
7. Children of Men (2006): Ultimately, this film is about hope, idealism and how one person can make a difference. Like any truly important science fiction film, it comments as much on our present as it does on our future. Alfonso Cuaron has created a brilliant hybrid: a protest-SF-action-road movie that suggests that very little separates the methods of the government and the terrorists.
8. Michael Clayton (2007): In the fine tradition of 1970s thrillers with a conscience, this film features George Clooney's most nuanced performance to date as corporate fixer torn between his allegiance to a friend and colleague who has seemingly gone crazy and the high-powered client that said co-worker has inexplicable screwed over. Clayton's transformation over the course of the film is masterfully handled by Clooney, resulting in a truly satisfying conclusion.
9. Birth (2004): A beautifully shot, deliberately paced mystery that has enough ambiguity so that by the end you're thinking about what you just say for days afterwards without feeling cheated. Nicole Kidman delivers a career-defining performance as a woman still recovering from the sudden death of her husband and about to remarry when he reappears in her life (or does he) in the body of a small boy. The best Stanley Kubrick film that the master never made.
10. Almost Famous (2000): Cameron Crowe's magnum opus and ode to classic rock in the 1970s. Deeply heartfelt and autobiographical, the film charts Crowe's cinematic surrogate as he goes on the road with a mid-level band and learns some valuable life lessons along the way. The film has an incredible soundtrack and a great cast of actors who bring their various characters vividly to life.
Also...
14. The Princess and the Warrior (2000)
16. Lost in Translation (2003)
17. The Man Who Wasn't There (2001)
20. 24 Hour Party People (2002)
23. Good Night, and Good Luck (2005)
25. The Royal Tenenbaums (2001)
Traffic, Sideways, The Departed, Brick, Cloverfield, Dogtown and Z Boys, Half-Nelson, Casino Royale, A Scanner Darkly, The 40-Year-Old Virgin, Mysterious Skin, The Good Shepherd, Brokeback Mountain, Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy, Punch-Drunk Love, Amelie,

















wow, very nice list. i love your top 10!
ReplyDeleteWell J.D., you've done a masterful job presenting a diversified list. All day at school today I tried to narrow down my own selections and with some surther tweeking and eliminating (and a nearly impossible numerical order) I have these 25 up:
ReplyDeleteFar From Heaven
Son Frere
The Fountain
WALL-E
Kings and Queen
The New World
A. I. Artificial Intelligence
Elephant
Dogville
Bright Star
Children of Men
Moolaade
The Lives of Others
Once
Avatar
Fateless
The Last Mistress
Chicago
Tropical Malady
Talk To Her
Brokeback Mountain
Atonement
35 Shots of Rum
Dancer in the Dark
Mulholland Drive
and a few others could still get in at the expense of a few already noted:
Inland Empire
In the Mood For Love
Cache
Vera Drake
Synecdoche, New York
4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days
Blissfully Yours
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
This is no easy task.
Your own layout and entire presentation is beautiful. Obviously we have some differences in taste, but I can't say you've made any dubious inclusions!
I always make a major blunder, and your own #1 film was accidentally omitted from the CERTAIN Top 25! hahahaha!!! I had it written down on this end, but jumped over it when making the previous blogging submission.
ReplyDeleteWhat a fine list. I finished my own just before the new year and there's some overlap. Hell, I really liked all of these that I've seen, except for Miami Vice, which I watched a while ago and am going to revisit in the next few days along with Public Enemies. I spent a few months watching a lot of Mann's back catalog and now I'm curious to rejudge those films.
ReplyDeleteThat is one impressive list, J.D. Many there are favorites of mine, some I haven't yet seen. Some thoughts:
ReplyDelete• while I enjoyed and appreciated THERE WILL BE BLOOD, I was constantly reminded of DDL's GANGS OF NEW YORK performance here (but, that could be just me)
• very glad to see MICHAEL CLAYTON so high up
• MEMENTO, each an annual viewing is so great
• I loved it from the beginning, but MIAMI VICE seemed to gather the same kind of negative reaction as PUBLIC ENEMIES did last year (and PE made my year's best--and I think it'll make the same upward re-appraisal by folks in the coming years)
• I've grown to love CHILDREN OF MEN, especially for some of the most unexpected of action sequences
• thankfully, Criterion will have CHE out this month (I've got to see it!)
It's great that you got this out, my friend. I don't think I muster one together (I'd be arguing with myself over 10 year's worth of selections). Thanks for this, J.D.
MrJeffery:
ReplyDeleteThanks for the kind words!
Sam Juliano:
Thank you for the compliments and I enjoyed your list! I left comments about it at Wonders in the Dark. It certainly wasn't easy putting them some kind of order as my opinion of what should be ranked where changes on a given day, except for ETERNAL SUNSHINE which belongs at the top of the heap. As you say, no easy task.
Jake:
MIAMI VICE is an interesting film. I think that Mann was really trying to push the boundaries of what people expect from a big budget action film and it certainly rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. He went even more minimalist in PUBLIC ENEMIES. Both films I love dearly and have improved the more times I watch 'em.
le0pard13:
Thanks for the kind words, my friend.
You raise an interesting point with DDL's performances in GANGS OF NY and THERE WILL BE BLOOD - both are larger than life, monstrous characters but I think that the crucial difference is that PTA and Scorsese are saying different things with their respective films (I know, that's stating the painfully obvious). I think that PTA is dealing with one man's single-minded obsession and accumulation of wealth whereas Scorsese's film is exploring something else entirely.
Yeah, I love MICHAEL CLAYTON as well. It's been on cable TV quite frequently over the holidays and I never tired of watching it whenever its on.
I agree with you that both MIAMI VICE and PUBLIC ENEMIES will enjoy re-appraisals later on once people have caught up to what Mann is doing in these films. I saw both on the big screen when they came out and loved 'em both.
CHILDREN OF MEN is an incredible film... I would agree with critics who have called it the BLADE RUNNER of its time. It certainly has that feel of a film ahead of its time.
I recently got a copy of the Criterion CHE to review but haven't had a chance to crack it open... yet. But I will definitely post my thoughts about it.
I think that Michael Mann is like Quentin Tarantino, not just for their impeccable attention to detail (QT of course with his writing, Mann with his precise visuals) but because, quite simply, you need to see their films more than once. Tarantino's films tend to be orgiastic free-for-alls on a first watch, and surprisingly (though not always) intelligent when you really start looking back at them. I find that Mann's films get better with repeats, so I'm very much looking forward to giving Miami Vice and Public Enemies second chances.
ReplyDeleteJake:
ReplyDeleteI dunno if I would compare Mann to QT but rather to Stanley Kubrick, of whom he is a big admirer of. Back when HEAT came out, Film Comment magazine wrote a fascinating profile on Mann and compared him to Kubrick in the sense that like him, Mann like to control every aspect of his big budget productions. The article went on to compare HEAT to Kubrick's THE KILLING but with the scope of 2001, which I really like. And like Kubrick, Mann's films, as you point out, improve and appreciate.
Oh, I didn't mean to compare Mann to QT in terms of style (at least no further than the details bit), but I think Mann edges closer to QT in terms of making populist entertainment that sneaks in art-film techniques under the noses of unsuspecting audiences, and it's not always easy to see that even when you appreciate them. I agree that Mann is stylistically more like Kubrick and that Film Comment article sounds very interesting.
ReplyDeleteGreat list, many of my own favorites on there. Miami Vice was so minimalist that it had as brutal a commentary on the drug war as Traffic did- they spend all that time, money, and personal sacrifice for nothing.
ReplyDeleteNext question on MIAMI VICE, then: theatrical or director's cut? I trade off on each year's viewing--and still can't make up my mind which I prefer. The floor is open...
ReplyDeleteAmazing to see how much crossover there is between your list and mine...
ReplyDeleteI think Miami Vice had some exceptional moments, the scene at the trailer park especially, and I like it a lot more than most folk do, but I'll never forgive it for the detour to Cuba(?) for drinks...
Jake:
ReplyDeleteOK, I see where you're coming from. Yeah, I suppose that's true that Mann is like QT in making populist entertainment altho, both MIAMI VICE and PUBLIC ENEMIES really test a mainstream audiences' patience as he really pushes the abstract narrative thing to the outer reaches. But you're right, he does try to sneak in artsy film techniques under the guise of a big-budget studio film.
Tommy Salami:
Good comparison to TRAFFIC! They both show the damage done by the on-going drug war and the staggering amount of wasted money spent on such a futile battle.
le0pard13:
Theatrical or diretor's cut? Tough call. I like how the theatrical cut drops you right into the night club. No intro or nothing, just dive right in. That being said, the director's cut, stylistically, opens up more like a typical Mann film but if push came to shove I'd have to go with the theatrical version.
Mark Salisbury:
heh, that's right, we do have quite a few crossover films. The trailer park scene in MV is exceptional, as is the climactic shoot-out. Even though, a lot of critics slammed the Gong Li-Colin Farrell romance subplot, I actually like it and glad that Mann placed more of an emphasis on it than the Jamie Foxx-Naomi Harris subplot. But maybe that's just me.
Great to see Miami Vice make the list, it's an unbelievably under-rated film so it's nice to see someone else has the same appreciation. Speaking of Farrell, any love for In Bruges?
ReplyDeleteLastly thanks for this excellent blog, I'm at film school at the moment and I find your blog more educational than all of my film studies classes put together. Really putting me on to some films I never would have discovered on my own so thank you very much.
Aidan Largey.
Aidan Largey:
ReplyDeleteThanks for your excellent comments!
Great to see another MIAMI VICE fan. All of this love for MV has inspired me to tackle it in my next post on Monday!
As for IN BRUGES, love that film! Now I'm thinking I shoulda put that on my list! The interplay between Farrell and Brendan Gleeson was fantastic. The dialogue was also outstanding - managing to be funny, profane and poignant... sometimes all at once!
I'm glad you've been turned on to some films. That's what I love about all of these film blogs out there... they've really turned me on to all kinds of films that I might never have checked out or given a chance. Take it easy!
Good list. I'm happiest to see Che made it, not because I agree with your selection (I didn't like it that much), but because the movie fell into this abyss as if it never happened (it's too good for that).
ReplyDeleteJason Bellamy:
ReplyDeleteYeah, the distribution for CHE, at least in North America, was pretty awful. I had to see it on On-Demand because it didn't play anywhere near where I lived. But I think that from the get-go its commercial prospects were pretty low.
I was kind of left out in the cold for Che, and I don't get On-Demand at my college apartment. It's available for Netflix streaming, but I'm wondering whether to wait to get the Criterion Blu-Ray. I don't blind-buy with CC, at least not since I blind-bought Seven Samurai (which essentially kick-started my love of film), but I've been on a Soderbergh kick lately and, even though he's et to make a film I wouldn't hesitate to call a masterpiece, he's easily one of the most interesting directors working today.
ReplyDeleteEh, I might just watch on Netflix anyway because this coming Tuesday is going to be brutal on my wallet (In the Loop, The Hurt Locker, Moon, 8 1/2)
Wow hats off bigtime for The Princess and the Warrior. Definitely one of my favorites. I can't believe it so few people have seen it considering the love for Tom Tykwer.
ReplyDeleteJake:
ReplyDeleteI won't say that CHE will test your limits if you're a Soderbergh fan but it certainly is an unconventional film in the sense that it doesn't blatantly manipulate you into either hating of loving Che. It is a very detached, objective film that show the nut 'n' bolts of guerrilla warfare. I'm a huge Soderbergh fan and I really dug this film. It might be my fave of his after OUT OF SIGHT. And the Criterion edition is pretty fantastic too.
Daniel Getahun:
Ah! Great to see another PRINCESS AND THE WARRIOR fan. I love this film. Easily the best thing Tykwer has ever done. A lot of folks hated his last film but I dug it in a '70s paranoid thriller kind of way.
Aw, crap...I'm one of those folks re: The International!
ReplyDeleteDigging the list, you've covered a really solid mix up of films (i'll also say, i always feel like Wonder Boys doesn't get the play it deserves).
ReplyDeleteExcellent list. Good to see Mulholland and Almost Famous present and correct, and also the presence of In The Mood For Love. This trio made my own list, and Inland Empire and 2046 were very close and may well have made it but for my 'no more than one film from any director' rule.
ReplyDeleteHave yet to see Che and look forward to doing so.
Daniel Getahun:
ReplyDeleteI think that it helped that I had heard from so many reviews that THE INTERNATIONAL was crap so my expectations were significantly lowered by the time I saw it and was pleasant surprised by how much I enjoyed the film. Go figure.
Wilde.Dash:
Thanks for stopping by and for the kind words. I am totally with you, re: WONDER BOYS. I love this film and continue to watch it again and again. It's a damn shame that Curtis Hanson hasn't been able to follow it up with anything as good since.
Steve Langton:
I liked INLAND EMPIRE but didn't love it. I really need to see it again and sort it all out as I found it very confusing/disorienting. Same goes for 2046. While it was beautiful to look at it I kept wondering what the point of it all was. I really need to revisit it.
I'm curious to know your thoughts on CHE when you get a chance to see it.
Such a great list JD, one of the best I have read!
ReplyDeleteJeremy Richey:
ReplyDeleteThanks, my friend! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I forgot to ask, J.D., have you ever seen MEMENTO in its chronological version (the hidden extra as found on the Limited Edition DVD). It holds up very well, and it's another reason why I really admire it so. Thanks.
ReplyDeletele0pard13:
ReplyDeleteY'know, I've yet to see MEMENTO in its chronological form. I have the Limited Edition DVD but just have never bothered to give it a spin but thanks for the reminder. I might just have to give it a try.
Awesome list. Eternal Sumnshine is my number one too. Most of the films on your list that I haven't seen are ones I want to. I think Zodiac has been too overlooked. Fincher is a genius. I love his films. Also love Almost Famous, Lost in Translation, Before Sunset, Memento, Good Night and Good Luck and The Royal Tenenbaums.
ReplyDeletefilmgeek:
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by! Yeah, ETERNAL SUNSHINE just keeps getting better and better every time I watch it. Such a great film. I also think very highly of ZODIAC and was shocked that it got so criminally overlooked during all the major awards.