If Michael Mann were to ever
direct a racing car film it would probably resemble Le Mans (1971), a passion project for its star Steve McQueen,
himself an avid racing car enthusiast. Much like Mann’s recent work, Le Mans eschews conventional narrative
storytelling in favor of an impressionistic approach with an emphasis on visual
storytelling and a surprising lack of dialogue. In some respects, McQueen is
the auteur of the film, committing so much time and resources that it
bankrupted him because the actor refused to compromise the vision he had for it
– the beauty and a sense of purity in racing. McQueen believed in the
relationship between man and machine and the notion that you’re not only racing
against an opponent, but also yourself in terms of mental and physical
endurance, which Le Mans explores in
fascinating ways.
Known as the 24 Hours of LeMans, it is the oldest active endurance racing sports car race in the world. It
began in 1923 near the town of Le Mans, France and occurs during the European
summer in June. The race starts in mid-afternoon, runs through the night and
finishes the next day at the same time it started. Racing teams maintain a
tricky balancing act between speed and the car’s capacity to run for 24 hours.
Also, the drivers are put to the test, often spending more than two hours
racing before stopping in the pits to switch control over to a relief driver.
Le Mans
prologue establishes its unconventional approach as Gulf Porsche Team driver
Michael Delaney (Steve McQueen) cruises through the French countryside. He
spots Lisa Belgetti (Elga Anderson) buying flowers, which provokes him to drive
to the scene of an accident that occurred during the previous 24 hours of the
Le Mans auto race where he was injured while rival driver Piero Belgetti was
killed. The entire sequence and subsequent flashback Delaney experiences is all
conveyed without any dialogue as the film shows us everything we need to know,
like a shot of the new section of guardrail that was replaced after the
accident. The flashback itself is an almost abstract collection of sights and
sounds: round circles of light at night to the roar of engines taking us back
to that fateful time. The crash is not actually shown, but conveyed through
editing with a shot of Belgetti’s frightened face, a shot of the guardrail, a
fiery explosion, a stray tire rolling away, and ending with a shot of the man’s
racing helmet lying on the ground, the flaming wreck reflected in its broken
visor. Whether he was responsible for it or not, Delaney feels some burden of
guilt for what happened.
The opening credits play
over the sleepy French town of Le Mans before the race starts with many
spectators camped out in tents from the night before. We see the town come to
life as preparations for the race are depicted documentary style over the
snazzy jazz soundtrack by Michel Legrand. The filmmakers immerse us in the
sights and sounds of the event so that we almost feel a part of it. Like many
films from the late 1960s and early 1970s, Le
Mans adopts a cinema verite style to create a sense of immediacy and
realism by mixing actual footage of the race with staged scenes that dramatize
Delaney’s story on and off the track. In this respect, it resembles Medium Cool (1969), which preceded it,
only doing for car racing what that film did for politics and journalism.
Instead of using title cards
or have some character explain it, the rules for the race are explained by the
race announcer as we see various drivers getting ready. This is a wonderful
example of the narrative economy at work as the filmmakers opt to show us as
much as possible and tell us little, leaving it up to the viewer to pay close
attention to what is going on. The way a character moves or how he acts or
reacts to others tells us what they are feeling at a given moment. This unusual
approach takes some time to acclimatize to as we are used to most films telling
us everything, spelling things out so that there is little nuance or ambiguity
– something that Le Mans is steeped
in.
A stretch of the race
becomes increasingly dangerous with the onset of rain and this not only makes
the roads wet, but very difficult to manage. Visibility is poor as the Porsche
and Ferrari teams engage in a battle of wills as the respective team managers
see who will bring their team in last and switch tires to compensate for the
weather. Then, it becomes a contest between who has the more efficient pit crew
as we see these men hard at work, the camera lingering on the minutia of their
actions. This sequence is cinematic catnip for gearheads and racing
enthusiasts.
With the character of Lisa, Le Mans shows how the car racing
lifestyle affects the loved ones of the racers. She looks a little haunted,
walking through the staging area, watching her husband’s team go on without
him. In between racing shifts, Delaney sits down with her at a cafeteria and
they finally cut through the tension between them. Not much is said, but the
looks they exchange speak volumes. Delaney and Lisa reconnect after he crashes
his car later on in the race and in his trailer she asks him, “What is so
important about driving faster than anybody else?” He replies, “A lot of people
go through life doing things badly. Racing’s important to men who do it well.
When you’re going racing it … it’s life. Anything that happens before or after
… is just waiting.” This is a beautifully acted scene, especially by McQueen
who delivers this iconic line almost matter-of-factly, spoken by a man who has
seen the highs and lows of racing and continues to do so because he is in the
pursuit of excellence. He wants to be among the very best of his profession
because he feels compelled, he’s driven to do it and this is something few
people truly understand and appreciate. It really is the key line of dialogue
that defines the film and explains Delaney’s motivations.
Le Mans
shows how a seemingly minor mistake, like overcompensating just a little to
avoid a stalled out car or being briefly distracted by a crash, can result in a
fiery crash that is edited rather dramatically. The crash itself is a noisy
affair, but as the dazed driver crawls out of the wreckage and attempts to get
away, there is no sound, which only enhances the unbelievable tension until the
car explodes, sending its driver sprawling. During this sequence, the editing
depicts it rapidly from several different angles in a very kinetic and visceral
way that would anticipate what contemporary action films would do by many
years.
Le Mans
also touches upon the parasitic nature of the press corp. that swarms all over
Lisa after Delaney’s crash. She is blindsided by a barrage of flashbulbs going
off and questions directed at her until Delaney steps in and protectively leads
her over to a car so she can escape. When a journalist asks Delaney how this
crash compares to the one last year that involved her husband, he just gives
the reporter that trademark intense McQueen look and walks off.
As far back as The Magnificent Seven (1960), Steve
McQueen had wanted to make a racing movie with John Sturges, who had worked
with the actor on the aforementioned film and The Great Escape (1963), directing and Warner Brothers
distributing. It was to be called Day of
the Champion and was to be made after McQueen had finished making The Sand Pebbles (1966). However, MGM
was making a racing car movie called Grand
Prix (1966) starring James Garner, which was able to get into production
before McQueen’s film. The actor was upset that he found out about this in a
newspaper and that Garner, a friend of McQueen’s, didn’t tell him. As a result,
McQueen didn’t talk to Garner for an entire year.
McQueen was determined to
make the definitive racing movie and felt that Le Mans was the best race to
depict because it represented the spirit of auto racing. After Warner Bros.
canceled Day of the Champion, CBS’
film division, Cinema Center, agreed to finance his racing film, now called Le Mans, for $6 million with Sturges
still on board to direct. Amazingly, the project was given the go-ahead without
a finished screenplay as McQueen and Sturges disagreed over the content. The
director felt that the film should feature a love story while the actor wanted
to go the pseudo-documentary route.
Principal photography began
on June 6, 1970 with 20,000 props and 26 race cars to be driven by 52
world-class drivers. The film crew was a mix of French and Americans with crowd
extras that sometimes exceeded more than 350,000 people. During filming, three
different writers were hired to create their own versions of the script. Incredibly,
they were competing against each other instead of working together.
Unfortunately, the
production couldn’t use any of the footage Sturges had shot prior at the 1969
Le Mans race because the Gulf-Porsche Team that McQueen’s character was a part
of had been eliminated early on when their car crashed. A mock race would have
to be staged, adding millions to the budget. In addition, Sturges was having
difficulty directing McQueen. At that point in his career, the actor was a big
movie star and according to the director, McQueen was “in a power position, so
if he didn’t like a line, he didn’t read it. If he didn’t want to say anything,
he didn’t.”
The budget continued to grow
as some of the best drivers in the world had been hired at considerable expense
and a crash involving six cars, each one of them costing $5,000, was added to
the shooting schedule. Word got back to Cinema Center that the production was
out of control and executives soon arrived on location much to McQueen’s
chagrin. The production was shut down for two weeks and Cinema Center even
toyed with the idea of replacing McQueen with Robert Redford.
McQueen was under a lot of
stress and didn’t want to shut down his passion project. He agreed to forfeit
his $750,000 salary and any points he’d get in gross profits as well as
relinquishing creative control. Sturges wanted to work on the script with
McQueen, but the actor was taking his wife Niele to Monaco in an attempt to
salvage their marriage. The director felt that the actor was being very unprofessional
and this was the final straw. He left the production. The producers had to
scramble to find a new director and Cinema Center enlisted Lee Katzin who was
about to shoot a television movie for them. Three days after getting the call,
he was in France. McQueen resented Katzin being imposed on him and was
difficult to work with for the first six weeks. Then, one day, while Katzin was
trying to figure out what to shoot, McQueen approached him and said, “I see
what you’re trying to do and I’m going to work for you and not against you.”
To add to the production’s
woes, Le Mans still didn’t have a
lead actress. McQueen wanted Diana Rigg, but she was unavailable. The studio
brought in Maud Adams, but once McQueen saw that she was taller then him the
actor wanted someone else, which ended up being German actress Elga Andersen (Bonjour tristesse). Meanwhile, the
production was plagued by two accidents. A Porsche caught on fire and was
ruined. Fortunately, the driver escaped serious injury. During filming, another
Porsche hit a guardrail at 200 mph and broke into several pieces. The driver
survived, but his right leg had to be amputated below the knee.
Principal photography
dragged on – originally scheduled to end in September 1970, but continuing on
into November. Even while trying to salvage his marriage, McQueen was having an
affair with actress Louise Edlind and other women. Niele and their children
came to visit McQueen in France and he admitted to seeing other women, which
understandably upset his wife. She admitted to having an affair herself and an
angry McQueen put a gun to her head. Not surprisingly, she and the kids went
back to the United States soon afterwards.
Filming was finally
completed in November and the production had gone $1.5 million over budget. It
took over six months to edit 450,000 feet of film into something resembling a
story with the studio shutting McQueen out of the post-production process. Le Mans was released in June 1971 and
the critics were not kind. The New York
Times’ Howard Thompson wrote, “Racing buffs will probably flip over it but
mostly it’s a bore.” In her review for the New
York Daily News, Kathleen Carroll wrote, “There was no attempt at
characterization. Le Mans is an
excuse for Steve McQueen to indulge his passion for auto racing and to show off
his skills as a racing driver.” Finally, Time
magazine’s Jay Cocks wrote, “Le Mans
may be the most famous auto race in the world, but from a theater seat it just
looks like a big drag.” The film made $19 million worldwide, but McQueen ended
up owing the IRS $2 million in back taxes. He was forced to shut down his
production company and turn over any profits to the government.
At its best, Le Mans recreates what it must’ve been
like to not only witness this famous race, but actually be in it. The race
sequences are dynamically shot, alternating between long shots of the action
and you-are-there point-of-view shots that do an excellent job of conveying the
speed and intensity of the race. Very little music plays over these sequences
in favor of the deafening roar of the car engines. Legrand’s music has a swanky
‘60s Euro jazz vibe that suits the film quite well. Throughout, Le Mans subverts the expectations of a
stereotypical racing film, right down to the ending, which doesn’t see Delaney
win personally, but his teams does, which is something a more traditional movie
like Days of Thunder (1990) doesn’t
do because it is all about the flash and the spectacle. There is a reason why Le Mans is still admired by racing
enthusiasts after all these years – it is a pure expression of what it means to
race at very high speeds and put your life at risk.
SOURCES
Terrill, Marshall. Steve McQueen: Portrait of an American Rebel.
Plexus: London. 1993.
Great write-up of an undervalued Steve McQueen film, J.D. Saw this on the big screen during last Spring's TCM Film Fest, with McQueen's son and pro drivers offering up a fantastic pre-movie discussion, and it was simply awesome. With today's diesel engines dominating this circuit nowadays, listening to the sounds of these legacy machines on film is something to behold. Well done, my friend.
ReplyDeleteFor me, this movie deserves MAJOR reappraisal. The approach it takes to its subject matter is purist and authentic in a way that you rarely - almost never, actually - see in Hollywood movies. The show, don't tell and open-ended nature of the story-telling was way ahead of its time, and the movie is often remarkably well-made - the editing of the opening of the race is a mini-masterpiece, and the crash scenes are like Sam Peckinpah motion sculptures. A really great movie.
ReplyDeleteExcellent review, JD, and fascinating to learn behind the scenes stuff. Recall my father taking me to see this on the big screen in the 70s' and I haven't viewed it since. Michael, must have been a great experience at the TCM fest.This has whetted my appetite to see Le Mans again.
ReplyDeletele0pard13:
ReplyDeleteSo cool that you got to see this on the big screen. I am very envious! LE MANS is a special kind of film. Very adventurous and ahead of its time for sure.
Tristan Eldritch:
I am right there with ya, re: LE MANS deserving of major re-appraisal. It is a rare film - an art house approach to racing car movies. And to think that there was all this turmoil going on behind the scenes and they still managed to turn out this incredible film. Amazing.
Steve Langton:
Thanks! Ah, you got to see it on the big screen, too! Nice. The Blu-Ray of this is really nice.
It’s a very interesting exercise to watch Grand Prix and LeMans back-to-back. At the time the former was considered to be the better film. It would be hard to agree nowadays, seeing how authentic LeMans is cinematically compared to the matte work on Dirk Bogarde’s scenes (he couldn’t drive). I’m a huge fan of the McQueen school of shooting race cars.
ReplyDelete