For my money, Le Divorce (2003) is one of the better
Woody Allen films not made by Allen. It is in fact made by Ismail Merchant and
James Ivory – the powerhouse filmmaking duo behind such hits like A Room with A View (1985), Howards End (1992), and The Remains of the Day (1993). In
retrospect, Le Divorce feels very
much like the European-set films Allen would start making a couple of years
later. It is set in the upper crust of society and features artists and
intellectuals and those around them dealing with troubled relationships and
dysfunctional families. In other words, prime Allen material.
Merchant Ivory landed a huge
casting coup with Kate Hudson and Naomi Watts, the former still enjoying buzz
from her breakout role in Almost Famous
(2000), and the latter with Mulholland
Drive (2001). Unfortunately, audiences and critics weren’t taken with the
film’s charms and it underperformed at the box office and received scathing
notices but I’ve always enjoyed its light, comedic touch with unexpected
dramatic moments even if it does suffer from a weak ending.
Isabel Walker (Hudson)
arrives in Paris to visit her sister Roxeanne (Watts), a poet who is pregnant
when we meet her and has also been abandoned by her husband Charles-Henri de
Persand (Melvil Poupaud) for another woman. Thankfully, Isabel has arrived just
in time to console her and provide support while also starting an affair with
Charles-Henri’s mother’s dashing brother-in-law Edgar (Thierry Lhermitte) who
is rich and also married, but as Roxy tells her, the French have a carefree
attitude towards infidelity. The rest of the film plays out the aftermath of
Roxy and Charles-Henri’s break-up and the ramifications for those close to them
in expected and unexpected ways.
Naomi Watts gets the
thankless role of the spurned woman who is miserable for most of the film as
she rails against a society with sexist attitudes towards divorce, which
rightly infuriates Roxy. Coming off of the 2002 English language remake of the
Japanese horror film Ringu (1998) and
going on to make the gritty drama 21
Grams (2003), she displayed quite an impressive range during this
period (and continues to do so). Roxy is
going through a turbulent period what with her pregnancy and the divorce and
Watts does an excellent job portraying the jumble of emotions her character is
experiencing on a daily basis.
Le Divorce explores the dynamic between Isabel and Roxy with the former being
young and impulsive while the latter is older and more experienced. Over the
course of the film we become sympathetic to Roxy’s plight and disapproving of
Isabel’s affairs because we know they will inevitably end badly and she doesn’t
have the emotional maturity to handle it. The filmmakers don’t judge her (or
anyone for that matter) and instead leave it up to the viewer to make up their
own mind.
After Almost Famous, Kate Hudson appeared in a series of romantic
comedies with varying degrees of success and so appearing in Le Divorce makes sense. Her role sees
Isabel torn between two Frenchmen, allowing the actress to mix comedy with
drama in a way that her Hollywood movies didn’t. Critics complained of the lack
of chemistry with Watts but I think they play well off each other. Isabel acts
as the audience surrogate and we are introduced to French culture through her
experiences. She turns out to be a good study, quickly adopting two lovers at
the same time.
The always-watchable Glenn Close steals scenes as Olivia Pace, an American author who lives in Paris and
hires Isabel to get her affairs in order. The veteran actress makes the most of
her screen-time, especially early on when Olivia tells Isabel about her
fascination with French women and how she’d love to write a book about them and
their customs: “Their scarves alone – an entire chapter.” She narrates a brief
montage of the various ways French women wear their scarves. Close does such a
great job of creating an intriguing character that I’d love to see her be the
focus of her own film.
In a genius bit of casting,
Stockard Channing and Sam Waterston – both of whom have appeared in Allen films
– play Roxy and Isabel’s parents with The
State’s Thomas Lennon as their uptight brother. Their scenes are the most
reminiscent of Allen’s films as they obsess over a family painting of Saint
Ursula that may or may not have been painted Georges de la Tour that Roxy
brought with her to France and Charles-Henri’s parents want to claim as
partially their own.
Matthew Modine pops up
intermittently throughout Le Divorce
as a creepy stalker type whose motives aren’t immediately clear but his
abrasive behavior has a jarring effect that threatens to break the spell that
Merchant Ivory have worked hard to maintain. He eventually upsets the film’s
tone at the climactic scene where the filmmakers lose their collective minds
and the plot as if they couldn’t figure out how to end things and tacked on one
borrowed from an American thriller.
Diane Johnson wrote Le Divorce after hearing many stories in
Paris about American women who came to France and married Frenchmen only for
their relationships to break up. Published in 1997, it went on to become a
best-seller. The city of Paris had always been a special place for Ismail
Merchant and James Ivory. Ivory had been traveling to the city for more than 50
years. He even owned an apartment with Merchant in Paris and their production
company had an office located there. Merchant said, “I think that Paris has
played a very special part in our lives.”
They bought the rights to her
novel after she had written a screenplay for Ivory’s production company. She
was asked to adapt her own novel and rewrote the ending, something that arose
from Disneyland in Paris refusing them to film the climactic scene there.
Merchant invited the deputy mayor of Paris to lunch and convinced him to empty
out the Eiffel Tower on short notice but only between the hours of 6:30 and
9:30 in the morning. Ironically, during filming, a holdup took place at the
American Express in Disneyland with hostages being taken.
Ivory was able to cast his
first two choices – Glenn Close and Kate Hudson with the former being someone
he wanted to work with for 20 years and the latter he considered the
quintessential California girl, which was ideal for the part. The most
challenging role to cast was that of Roxy. Many actresses were asked but none
of them were interested because, according to Ivory, “I thought it was because
they had to go around playing pregnant for two-thirds of the movie, crying and
slashing their wrists and things.” After seeing Mulholland Drive, Ivory sent Naomi Watts a copy of the script. She
identified with the character because she claimed to have “always felt like an
outsider,” growing up in a family that moved around frequently and so she never
felt like she “belonged anywhere.”
Le Divorce received mixed to negative reviews
from critics. Roger Ebert gave the film three out of four stars and wrote, “Le Divorce doesn’t work on its intended
level, because we don’t care enough about the interactions of the enormous
cast. But it works in another way, as a sophisticated and knowledgeable
portrait of values in collision.” In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, “The film’s greatest
achievement, however, is in keeping a dizzying variety of characters at odds
with each other without any breach of good manners, and without descending to
facile stereotypes and caricatures.” Entertainment
Weekly gave it a “C” rating and Owen Gleiberman wrote, “I’m disappointed to
report that Hudson and Watts have no chemistry as sisters, perhaps because
Watts never seems like the expatriate artiste she’s supposed to be playing.” The New York Times’ A.O. Scott wrote,
“As it is, Le Divorce is tasteful,
but almost entirely without flavor. It is tough work to sit through a comedy
made by filmmakers with so little sense of timing and no evident sense of
humor. What’s French for annulment?” USA
Today gave the film two-and-a-half out of four stars and Claudia Puig
wrote, “It is so cliché to end this cosmopolitan tale of families attempting to
cross a cultural divide in the cheap, derivative and violent manner of a bad
American action flick.” In her review for the Washington Post, Ann Hornaday wrote, “But Le Divorce is essentially the story of two sisters, and this is
where the movie fatally breaks down, mostly due to an off-kilter performance by
Watts…Hudson does her best to carry her co-star but – through no fault of her
own – doesn’t fare much better.”
Le Divorce explores the clash of cultures as Roxy and Isabel try to
understand Charles-Henri and his family’s attitudes towards love, marriage and
relationships. They quickly learn that the French have a certain kind of
detachment when it comes to the end of a relationship. It seems as if they fall
in and out of love with ease whereas Roxy still has feelings for her husband
because he’s the father of their child and unborn child. Isabel tries her hand
at European-style relationships and enjoys herself initially but soon finds it
all a bit messy emotionally.
Since Roxy is the film’s
protagonist, we are meant to empathize with her. Charles-Henri’s cruel
treatment of her makes him the obvious antagonist until the film’s climax when
Merchant Ivory pull the rug out from under the audience and get him out of the
way a little too neatly, replacing him with Modine’s spurned husband. That
being said, two-thirds of Le Divorce
takes a delightful, engaging look at French culture via fine art, cuisine,
fashion, and architecture, transporting the audience to Paris for two hours.
Director James Ivory uses Paris quite effectively with its colorful streets
full of restaurants, cafes and bookstores as a backdrop for the colorful
characters that populate the film. Unlike Woody Allen’s superior Midnight in Paris (2011), however, it
doesn’t end on a satisfying note. It doesn’t follow through in a way that
remains true to what came before, which is a shame because it has so much going
for it.
SOURCES
Chautard, Andre. “It’s Divorce, Parisian Style.” Los Angeles
Times. August 5, 2003.
Entertainment News Service.
“Americans in Paris.” Chicago Tribune. August 8, 2003.
Hohenadel, Kristin. “Californians
in Paris; Merchant Ivory, Too.” The New York Times. September 8, 2002.
Kehr, Dave. “Merchant-Ivory
Eiffel.” The New York Times. August 8, 2003.
Of the films of Merchant-Ivory that I've seen. This is one of my least favorites as I just couldn't get into it as I didn't think it was funny. Plus, I was so bored by any scene with Kate Hudson who I think is overrated. She has her moments in movies like Wish I Was Here and You, Me, & Dupree but never could rise to the occasion.
ReplyDeleteI feel the same way about Kate Hudson re: overrated, and there are very few films I like her in. Oddly enough, this is one of the few but I can certainly understand how you feel about this one! It is not a very beloved film.
DeleteDefinitely for lovers of Woody Allen
ReplyDelete