The 1980s was not an easy decade for
Robert Altman. After enjoying a fantastic run of films in the 1970s that
included the likes of McCabe and Mrs. Miller
(1971), The Long Goodbye (1973), California Split (1974), and Nashville (1975), he effectively burned
his bridges with the Hollywood studios with Popeye
(1980) and found work in Europe and took to adapting stage plays for the big
screen through independent financing. In the early ‘80s, National Lampoon magazine published wild stories about two
troublemaking teenagers named Oliver Cromwell “O.C.” Ogilvie and Mark Stiggs,
written by Tod Carroll and
Ted Mann.
I don’t know if it was Altman’s agent’s
idea or the director saw all these successful teen comedies being made and
decided to try one himself, but O.C. and Stiggs (1987) was an ill fit to say the least – one that
has its charms and its moments, but definitely a cinematic oddity in the man’s
filmography. He didn’t care for the genre and turned this indifference into a
movie that was a biting satire of the genre. Not surprisingly, nobody liked it
and the movie quickly disappeared. Even among Altman fans it has few supporters
and with good reason.
O.C. (Daniel Jenkins) and Stiggs (Neill Barry) are suburban teens and avid practical jokers that live in Phoenix,
Arizona. The main target of their gags is the Schwab family, a decadent,
materialistic clan headed by Randall Schwab (Paul Dooley), an arrogant blowhard
who sells insurance. The mother (Jane Curtin) is a drunk, their son (Jon Cryer)
is a gullible idiot while their daughter is about to get married. The source of
the boys’ ire towards the Schwabs stems from Randall cancelling O.C.’s grandfather’s
(Ray Walston) retirement insurance thus denying him the ability to have
assisted care. The movie recounts O.C. and Stiggs’ summer spent terrorizing the
Schwabs.
In some respects, O.C. and Stiggs are
like teenage versions of Hawkeye and Trapper John from M*A*S*H (1970). Both feature clever hipsters but the latter were
also brilliant surgeons whereas the former are only good at one thing – staging
elaborate practical jokes. In M*A*S*H,
the two surgeons were fighting against authority and the absurdity of war while
O.C. and Stiggs are fighting against materialism and mediocrity as represented
by the Schwabs with their bad fashion sense and gaudy décor – the epitome of
the “ugly American.”
The problem with O.C. and Stiggs is the central characters. They aren’t particularly
interesting. Their obsession with pulling endless practical jokes on the
Schwabs seems mean-spirited at times with Stiggs embodying the spirit of them
while O.C. is given scenes away from his friend that flesh out his character a
little bit – at least we get some insight into his behavior. They aren’t as
cool as they think they are – they have no friends and no girlfriends thanks to
their obnoxious behavior. The teen pranksters are rebelling against the
mind-numbing banality of suburbia and the “Greed is good” era of Reaganomics.
There is an attempt to provide some kind of motivation for why these kids do
what they do. Stiggs’ dad is cheating on his wife while O.C.’s grandfather is
unemployed and possibly senile. No wonder they spend all their time together
devising elaborate schemes. It is a form of escape from their mundane
surroundings.
This movie sees Altman in an extremely
playful mood with the same kind of fast and loose structure as California Split, which also features two
freewheeling pals careening from one crazy encounter to another. A crazed,
babbling Dennis Hopper even pops up as a burnt out Vietnam vet. It’s as if his
photographer character from Apocalypse
Now (1979) had somehow made it out of Kurtz’s compound and came back to the
United States. The boys cross paths with a Schwab neighbor played with
effortless cool by Martin Mull. At one point, Stiggs asks him what he does and
he replies without missing a beat, “Well, basically I drink and make a lot of
money.” Unfortunately, he disappears as quickly as he was introduced but
thankfully, and inexplicably, shows up later at a sports-themed restaurant
opposite Bob Uecker playing himself, rattling off athletes’ names
indiscriminately.
There are some enjoyable moments, like a
rare instance of seriousness when we see O.C. having breakfast with his
grandfather and we see how the latter’s health affects the former. His jokey
demeanor is a façade to cover his rather bleak home life. Another wonderful
moment comes when O.C. dances with a beautiful girl (Cynthia Nixon) at the
Schwab wedding – a nod to classic Hollywood cinema by way of Fred Astaire and
Ginger Rogers. It isn’t enough to keep this uneven movie together.
The characters of O.C. and Stiggs,
created by Tod Carroll and
Ted Mann,
were one of the most popular features in National
Lampoon magazine. Their last appearance – in the October 1982 issue – would
go on to provide the basis for the movie’s screenplay. Jeffrey Katzenberg over
at Paramount Studios loved the stories of these crazy kids and wanted to make
them into a movie. A script was written by Carroll and Mann and Sylvester
Stallone even briefly flirted with the project.
Young, up-and-coming producer Peter
Newman was assigned the project and was able to get Mike Nichols interested in
directing but his numerous commitments on Broadway forced him to bow out.
Newman had gotten friendly with Robert Altman and pitched the project to him.
He was looking for work at the time. MGM, still licking their wounds from the Heaven’s Gate (1980) debacle, were
desperate to make a successful teen comedy. Freddie Fields, Altman’s former
agent, became the head of MGM at a time when the director was on the outs with
Hollywood studios. He agreed to hire Altman to make O.C. and Stiggs but only for $8 million or less and that he
promised to shoot the script (the director was notorious for throwing out the
script and improvising dialogue). Two months later, Altman was in Phoenix,
Arizona in the middle of summer of 1983 where temperatures soared to 120
degrees, making a movie he wasn’t jazzed about doing.
When Altman showed the movie to MGM,
their executives didn’t like it and Newman said, “That’s one of the few
instances where Bob didn’t want to hang around and fight the fight. He didn’t
finish that movie. The studio finished that movie.” This certainly explains the
final product and the odd push-pull of style vs. content. Neither Carroll and Mann nor the movie’s two
young leads were happy with the final product. To make matters worse, MGM was
in financial trouble and so the movie sat on the shelf for years until 1988
where it was screened at the Film Forum in New York City for a week.
There is something oddly fascinating
watching Altman apply his trademark aesthetic to the ‘80s teen comedy. While
O.C. and Stiggs pull pranks on the hapless Schwabs, the director bombards the
soundtrack with multiple layers of sound and overlapping dialogue, and his
slow, roaming camera gradually zooms in on something that strikes his fancy. Altman
flips the ‘80s teen comedy on its head. He even refuses to populate the film’s
soundtrack with trendy New Wave music, instead opting for the catchy African
music of King Sunny Ade. No wonder people hated this movie when it came out.
Clearly Altman did not grasp the original source material (or didn’t even
bother to read it) and just did his own thing.
O.C.
and Stiggs is what happens when you pair up a filmmaker with a genre
he has no affinity for and the results are, at times, amusing. At some point,
you either surrender yourself to the goofiness of the whole enterprise or
resist this maddeningly frustrating effort. Aesthetically, it is typical Altman
fare but content-wise he’s out of his depth: sometimes, this can result in a
fascinating train wreck or a big ol’ bore. This movie falls somewhere
in-between. I can’t totally dismiss it but I don’t watch it very often either.
This one is for Altman completists only.
SOURCES
Stephenson, Hunter. “Let O.C. and
Stiggs Live.” Apology Magazine.
Zuckoff, Mitchell. Robert Altman: An Oral Biography.Vintage. 2010.
I want to see this as I'm interested in anything Altman no matter how bad it is.
ReplyDeleteIt is definitely worth checking out if you're an Altman obsessive like myself. It is a mess of a film but interesting in parts.
Delete