Why is popular culture so
fascinated with serial killers? There are all kinds of reality television shows
and their fictional counterparts dedicated to examining their perverse
methodology. What compels these murderers to kill several people in all kinds
of horrible ways? There are as many reasons why as there are serial killers as
each one has their own unique motivation. Our fascination comes from the morbid
speculation that one’s next-door neighbor may have a bunch of severed heads in
their fridge. It’s rubbernecker syndrome – an interest in the gruesome details
of the murders. It is also the relief in the knowledge that you’re still alive
and safe and not the murder victim,
that in some way you’ve cheated death.
In 1995, David Fincher
directed Seven, one of the best films
about serial killers. With the commercial and critical success of that film, he
was careful not to get pigeonholed in the genre and didn’t return to it until Zodiac (2007), which was a very
different take indeed. His fascination with serial killers continues with Mindhunter, a show created by Joe Penhall, based on the true crime book of the same name by John E. Douglas and
Mark Olshaker, that he is executive producing and directed four episodes for
Netflix.
Set in 1977, the show
focuses on the FBI’s nascent Behavioral Science Unit with two agents – Holden
Ford (Jonathan Groff) and Bill Tench (Holt McCallany) – fighting against
internal resistance – their superior (Cotter Smith) thinks they’re wasting the
Bureau’s time – and external ignorance – local law enforcement doesn’t
understand what they’re doing. We meet Ford working as a hostage negotiator as he unsuccessfully tries to defuse a situation involving a man
armed with a shotgun and holding a woman hostage.
After failing to calm the
man down, which results in his death, Ford is ordered by his superior to
continue teaching his hostage negotiator course at Quantico. It is here that we
get the first inklings that Ford is different. He’d rather settle a hostage
situation peacefully than through excessive force by reasoning with the
criminal and the way to do this is figuring out what motivates them…but how?
After his latest class, Ford
overhears a lecture in a nearby classroom. The instructor is talking about
David Berkowitz (a.k.a. The Son of Sam) and offers up this observation: “You
could say that the guy is crazy or that he’s pretending that he’s crazy but if
we’re looking for a motive we can understand we suddenly find there is none.
It’s a void. It’s a black hole.” He points out that in Hoover’s heyday,
criminals like John Dillinger and Baby Face Nelson were easy to figure out
because they did what they did for personal gain.
Someone like Berkowitz is
completely different. “Where do we go when motive becomes elusive?” the
instructor says. It is this line that hits Ford like a thunderbolt and serves
as an epiphany. He and the instructor have a fascinating discussion that is
really the show’s thesis: if the world no longer makes sense, then neither does
crime. They both agree that they don’t know what to do about it, which Ford
wonders, “But we’re supposed to, right?” to which the instructor replies,
“Sure. But here’s the troubling thing – no one’s even asking the questions.”
This is just one of many well-written, masterfully acted conversations depicted
over the course of the ten episodes of Mindhunter.
This scene also sets the tone: this is going to be a character-driven show that
eschews traditional cop show heroics in favor of dialogue-heavy explorations
into what motivates serial killers.
The first half of episode
one focuses not just on Ford’s professional life but his personal one as he
meets a witty, attractive woman named Debbie (Hannah Gross) at a rock concert
that is just as smart as he is if not more so, much to his surprise. Their
initial meet-cute turns into a first date where she takes him back to her place
and gets him to take a bong hit in an effort to loosen him up. They even go see
Dog Day Afternoon (1975), which he is
so impressed with that he shows it to his class. Debbie isn’t afraid to call
Ford on his bullshit and is willing to challenge his beliefs, which makes for
an entertaining give and take between them in their scenes together. There’s a
sexy and smart frisson between these two characters that is a lot of fun to
watch. After sex one night, she playfully chastises his naïveté about sex,
calling him a monk, chiding him, “How can you figure out the criminal mind if
you can’t even figure out your girlfriend?” Good point.
Jonathan Groff plays an
atypical FBI agent. He’s youthful and sensitive – hardly the Melvin Purvis
type. He’s also very smart but lacks the street smarts to excel in the field as
evident in the bungled hostage negotiation that kicks off the show. He needs more
time in the field with an experienced veteran showing him the ropes. His boss
arranges a meeting with Tench and the elder agent instantly reads the younger
one. He asks Ford to tag along with him on the road, teaching FBI techniques to
local law enforcement all over the country.
Initially, it appears that
Fincher is treading on familiar turf with the Ford-Tench duo – the idealistic
young agent butting heads with the older, more experienced agent. What Ford
lacks in experience, he makes up for with intelligence and soon his enthusiasm
for profiling serial killers is contagious enough to convince Tench and then
their boss to interview them. Ford isn’t the brash, impulsive person that Mills
was in Seven and Tench isn’t ready to
give up on humanity like Somerset was in that earlier film.
Their first teaching gig
does not go well. Ford gets too cerebral, his college training confuses most of
the cops while Tench tries to keep things simple. Ford ends up pissing off a
veteran detective who then asks them for advice on a grisly local murder case.
They offer several theories but nothing concrete for the clearly frustrated
detective, which only upsets him even more. And so it goes. Not every case can
be solved but it is unusual for one of the protagonists to admit it so
honestly. The episode ends with nothing resolved and tangible tension between
Ford and Tench.
Setting Mindhunter in the late 1970s is an interesting choice. As Fincher
has pointed out in interviews, it was the end of the J. Edgar Hoover era with
the last vestiges of the stereotypical FBI agent idealized by Melvin Purvis and
represented by Ford and Tench’s boss being replaced by people like Ford. Tench
represents a bridge between the two eras. He still adheres to old school
practices but is receptive to Ford’s new way of thinking and Holt McCallany
does an excellent job of showing how his character deals with these contrasting
schools of thought – the old vs. the new. Initially, Tench doesn’t reveal much
about himself but over the course of the show he’s given moments, like a quiet
scene in a bar with Ford in the fourth episode, where he reveals a very
personal detail about his home life that is wonderfully conveyed by the actor
who displays an impressive amount of vulnerability. A few minutes later, we are
shown a glimpse of his home life in a heartbreakingly understated scene.
In order to understand the
criminal mind better it makes sense that one should talk to criminals. Ford
wants to interview Charles Manson but he’s unreachable – ever for the FBI – and
so at one of their teaching gigs a cop says they should talk to Edmund Kemper
(Cameron Britton) a.k.a. the Co-Ed Killer, a man that decapitated 16 teenage
girls and had sex with the corpses. He’s a dream interview – he loves to talk
about himself. Fincher films Ford walking through the prison, down the halls
among the inmates with the sounds of them leering and yelling at him. The look
on his face is one of palpable unease.
The meeting with Kemper is a
brilliant sequence that begins on a comical note as the killer insists Ford has
an egg salad sandwich as if he were entertaining him in his living room. The
serial killer initially comes off as an affable man. He’s eloquent and honest
(“People who hunt other people for a vocation all we want to talk about is what
it’s like.”) and is able to become unsettlingly threatening on a dime. Kemper
recounts his normal childhood and how it ran parallel to another, more depraved
life. He fascinates Ford, while Tench is convinced that he’s manipulating his
partner, telling him what he wants to hear. On the second visit, Ford is a
little too chummy with Kemper in an amusing bit where they actually banter back
and forth. They delve into the man’s past and what motivated him, which he
tells in a chilling monologue. Cameron Britton does an excellent job playing
Kemper. He moves little, letting his eyes convey his feelings. Kemper is
someone that plays things close to the vest, reading Ford and then telling a
story of how he killed his mother in a creepy, matter-of-fact monotone.
Not surprisingly, the most
compelling parts of Mindhunter are
the interviews with the killers. As Fincher has said, these scenes are like
little one act plays as these guys tell their stories. The show wisely doesn’t
resort to flashbacks, which would be the obvious thing to do, and instead lets
the actors playing these killers flex their acting chops, holding our attention
with their ability to tell their characters’ depraved stories and make it
compelling.
Meeting Kemper convinces Tench
that there is value in talking to serial killers in order to understand what
motivates them and he decides to stick up for Ford when their boss chews them
out for interviewing the murderer without telling him. They’re threatened with
suspension and it is this confrontation that bonds Ford and Tench. By the end
of the second episode they’ve finally gelled as a team. They are finally on the
same page.
As Mindhunter continues, Ford and Tench begin to diverge on how the
work they do affects them. The latter is increasingly repulsed by the repellent
nature of the killers they talk to, while the former finds himself getting
deeper into the mindset of these men, running the risk of becoming like them,
treading the same line that Will Graham does in Manhunter (1986). Mindhunter
shows how these cases take their toll on the men that investigate them, most
significantly, Tench who doesn’t tell his wife anything about his work and this
causes noticeable tension between them. This is explored in a scene where she
confronts him about it. As their work continues, Ford becomes more analytical
and detached while Tench is more empathetic, especially when they interact with
the killers and the local cops.
Are serial killers born or
are they formed? This is a question that Ford and Tench wrestle with over the
course of the ten episodes. It is why they are interviewing these men in the
first place. Mindhunter does a superb
job balancing the procedural aspects of Ford and Tench’s work with the impact
it has on their personal lives in a way that gradually makes them rich and
compelling characters over time. This is thoughtful, absorbing procedural that
takes the time to delve not just into the work that these men do but their
personal lives as well in a deeper way that Fincher was trying to do in Zodiac but was constrained by the limitations
of feature filmmaking. The medium of television has allowed him to go as deep
as he wants and this results in some of his best work.
Agreed. Really found this series absorbing and engaging. Fincher's visual style and approach to the material is spot on too. It felt like he looks what he learned making "Zodiac" and just developed it even further. Looking forward to a season two for sure.
ReplyDeleteAs am I and yes, it really does feel like an extension of ZODIAC, which I also love.
Delete