With the recent and unfortunate passing of Forrest J. Ackerman, I thought I would post a tribute to a classic science fiction film of the 1950s as a nod the kinds of films that Ackerman championed over the years.
There have been three remakes of the classic 1956 film, Invasion of the Body Snatchers— 1979, 1994, and 2007 respectively. This does not include the countless rip-offs and homages that have been made since the original graced the screen: some good (They Live), some bad (The Astronaut’s Wife) and some just plain ugly (Body Snatchers). By far the superior film in every way is the 1956 version directed by Don Siegel, which continues to thrill and entertain while hopeless rehashes like Abel Ferrara’s film try in vain to recapture the power and the impact of its predecessor. What Ferrara and other imitators don't understand is that extravagant special effects and elaborate chases do not compensate for a non-existent story and weak characters — something that Siegel understood implicitly and wisely avoided in his film.
Adapted from Jack Finney’s excellent novel The Body Snatchers(1954), Siegel’s film is the best of all the versions made because it is the most faithful to the novel. The film begins with suspenseful music while the credits are shown over a sky filled with rushing clouds. After the credits end we meet a frantic Dr. Miles Bennell (Kevin McCarthy) who is being questioned by the police. When a psychiatrist arrives Miles goes wild, until reassured that his story will be heard. What follows is a flashback account of how Dr. Bennell, with the help of an old girlfriend, Becky Driscoll (Dana Wynter) uncover a secret plot by aliens from outer space to take over the inhabitants of the small town of Santa Mira. It is a subtle invasion that at first glance does not appear to be that much of a threat, but as Miles and Becky soon discover, its implications reach far and wide, threatening not only close friends like Jack and "Teddy" Belicec (King Donovan and Carolyn Jones), but all of humanity.
The film's inception lies in the hands of producer Walter Wanger who had read Finney's story in its original serial form in Collier's magazine. He felt that it would make a good low-budget film for Allied Artists and asked Don Siegel to direct. After convincing screenwriter Daniel Mainwaring to join the production, the film began to take shape. From the start, the three men shared the same approach to the material. Their intention was to have the film act as a metaphor for the way "the majority of people in the world unfortunately are pods, existing without any intellectual aspirations and incapable of love,” remembers Siegel. Originally, producer Walter Wanger and director Don Siegel wanted to shoot Invasion of the Body Snatchers on location in Jack Finney's model for Santa Mira, MillValley, just north of San Francisco. In the first week of January 1955, Siegel, Wagner, and screenwriter Daniel Mainwaring visited Finney to talk about the film version and to take a look at MillValley. The location proved to be too expensive and Siegel and some Allied Artists executives found locations resembling MillValley in nearby Sierra Madre, Chatsworth, Glendale, the Los Feliz neighborhood and in Bronson and BeachwoodCanyons. However, much of the film was shot in the Allied Artists studio on the east side of Hollywood. Invasion of the Body Snatchers was originally budgeted for a 24-day schedule at $454,864 and the studio asked Wanger to cut the budget significantly. The producer proposed a shooting schedule of 20 days and a budget of $350,000.
Initially, Wanger considered Gig Young, Dick Powell, Joseph Cotton, and several others for the role of Miles. For Becky, he thought of casting Anne Bancroft, Donna Reed, Kim Hunter, Vera Miles, and others. With the lower budget, Wanger had to abandon these choices and cast Richard Kiley, who had just starred in Phoenix City Story for Allied Artists. Kiley turned the role down and Wanger cast two relative newcomers in the lead roles: Kevin McCarthy, who had just starred in Siegel's Annapolis Story, and Dana Wynter, who had done several major dramatic roles on television but had not done a film.
The film was shot in 23 days between March 23, 1955 and April 18. The cast and crew worked a six-day week with only Sundays off. The production went over schedule by three days because of night-for-night shooting that Siegel wanted. The final budget was $382,190. Siegel used his lack of budget and unknown actors to create an authentic, natural feeling of normalcy to the proceedings. This became one of the strengths of the film. We so easily believe that this is Smalltown, USA that when the horror of what is really happening becomes apparent the shock is that much more significant. Siegel, a former special effects expert knew full well the pitfalls of relying too much on effects and not on the plot. "Instead of doing what so many science fiction and horror films do — spend all their money on special effects and put poor actors on the screen — we concentrated on the performers. The main thing about the picture, however, was that it was about something and that's rare." And so Siegel actually used the handicap of a small budget to his advantage by downplaying the special effects in favor of creating strong, three-dimensional characters and telling a suspenseful, often scary story.
The project was originally called, The Body Snatchers after the Finney serial. However, Wanger wanted to avoid confusion with the Val Lewton 1945 horror film with a very similar title. The producer was unable to come up with a title and accepted the studio's choice, They Come from Another World that was assigned in summer 1955. Siegel protested this title and suggest two alternatives: Better Off Dead and Sleep No More, while Wanger offered Evil in the Night and World in Danger. None of these were chosen as the studio finally settled on Invasion of the Body Snatchers in late 1955. Wanger saw the final cut in December 1955 and protested the use of the Superscope format. Its use had been a part of the early plans for the film but the first print was not made until December. Wanger felt that the film lost sharpness and detail. Siegel had originally shot Invasion of the Body Snatchers in the 1.85:1 aspect ratio. The Superscope look was a post-production lab process designed to make the film resemble the popular Cinemascope format.
The studio scheduled three previews for the film on the last days of June and the first day of July 1955. According to Wanger's memos at the time, the previews were successful. However, later reports by Mainwaring and Siegel contradict this, claiming that audiences could not follow the film and laughed in the wrong places. In response, the studio removed much of the film's humor, "humanity", and "quality", according to Wanger. He scheduled another preview in mid-August that did not go well. The studio decided to change the film's title to a more conventional science fiction one. In later interviews, Siegel pointed out that it was studio policy not to mix humor with horror. Both Siegel and Mainwaring were satisfied with the film as shot. It was originally intended to end with Miles screaming hysterically as truckloads of pods pass him by. The studio, wary of such a pessimistic conclusion, insisted on adding a prologue and epilogue to the movie that suggested a more optimistic outcome to the story which is thus told mainly in flashback. Siegel decided to shoot these scenes because he knew the studio would put them in regardless and if he filmed them then perhaps he could do a little damage control. Mainwaring scripted this framing story and Siegel shot it on September 16, 1955 at Allied Artists.
Siegel had problems with these sequences because as he saw it, they let "you know right away that something unusual is going on. If you start, as I wanted to, with McCarthy arriving in the town of Santa Mira, it reveals it slowly, we understand why McCarthy can't readily accept the terrible thing that appears to be happening. And the dramatic impact of the ending is reduced with the epilogue." Allied Artist also made Siegel cut out a lot of the humor in the film, but enough survived for the director's intended effect. "I felt the idea of pods growing into a likeness of a person would strike the characters as preposterous. I wanted to play it that way," Siegel remembers, "with the characters not taking the threat seriously. For example, if you told me now that there was a pod in my likeness in the other room, I would joke about it. However, when I opened the door and saw the pod, the full shock and horror would hit me and the fun would be gone. I wanted the people in the film to behave like normal people." Despite the studio's constant meddling, Siegel managed to create an impressive film whose impact has not diminished over the years.
In addition to these bookends, Wanger wanted to add a variety of speeches and prefaces. He suggested a voice-over introduction for Miles. While the film was being shot, Wanger tried to get permission in England to use a Winston Churchill quotation as a preface to the film. The producer also tried to get Orson Welles to voice the preface and a trailer for the film. He wrote speeches for Welles' opening on June 15, 1955 and spent considerable time trying to convince Welles to do it but was unsuccessful and considered science fiction author Ray Bradbury instead but this also did not happen. Mainwaring eventually wrote the voice-over narration himself. The shorter version of the film was often rerun late at night on TV stations and one PBS showing in 1988. The full theatrical version was not widely released until 1978 when a remake was produced starring Donald Sutherland.
Like the novel, Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a real marvel of pacing — achieved by gradually building the suspense, until the tension is too much. When Miles begins to tell his story, he starts by saying, “At first glance everything looked the same. It wasn’t. Something evil had taken possession of the town.” While these words are spoken, Siegel presents an ordinary looking small town. Miles’ words are a teaser that makes us curious. We want to know what this evil force is, how it has taken the town captive, and why it seems so normal. It is this curiosity that draws us into the story. At first everything seems normal, but little details appear that suggest otherwise. Maybe it is the scared child running out in front of Miles’ car, the same boy who later claims that his mother is not his mother, crying, “Don’t let her get me!” These events are all warning signs that point to a larger, impending danger that threatens the small town.
By giving us only bits and pieces at a time, Siegel slowly begins to reveal the threat of alien invasion. People act normal enough, but something is slightly askew. People seem to have emotions, but as one character observes, “There is just the pretense of it.” Body Snatchers feeds on our fear of dehumanization and conformity — not only of ourselves, but our family and friends. A lot of the suspense in the film is derived from the fact that the characters must stay awake to remain human; to sleep means becoming a pod. Sleep is an important motif of the film, to the point where Siegel originally wanted it to be called Sleep No More, a reference to Shakespeare's play, Macbeth. For Siegel, sleep is a metaphor for conformity or the stifling of any intellectual curiosity. People often sleepwalk through their whole lives — never truly alive. And like Miles in the film, we are surrounded daily by these intellectual sleepers, being subtly invaded by their ever-growing numbers. Again, the studio stepped in and imposed a more science fiction/horror-like title which the filmmaker had no choice but to accept.
Despite the compromises Siegel was forced to make, his original intentions were not diminished. Through subtle references and imagery, he managed to convey his fears of conformity and present the solution to this problem in the form of its hero: Miles Bennell who embodies individuality and humanity — something that the pods (read modern industrial society) try to destroy. Unfortunately, Invasion of the Body Snatchers was not blessed with a big budget or big name stars and as a result critics and box office success ignored it upon initial release. Over the years film buffs and student groups began to take interest in the film and an ever-growing cult following developed leading to its rediscovery in the 1960s by French New Wave critics who declared it to be one of the best and most influential science fiction films of the 1950s, along side such classics as The Thing (1951), The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951), and Them! (1954). American critics underestimated the widespread influence it has had since its initial release. A much imitated (see The Hidden amongst many others) film, it still manages to captivate and delight people today. The film has been read on many different levels, most often as a subtext for protesting Senator Joseph McCarthy and his Red Scare mentality or as an anti-Communist allegory. First and foremost it is an entertaining film that blends a science fiction premise with film noir and horror elements (in particular, its use of unusual camera angles, close-ups, sharp editing, music, and lighting). Despite two remakes, the original film is the superior version because its director, Don Siegel understood Finney’s novel and was able to translate its intent successfully to the screen without relying on flashy special effects and trickery like so many contemporary science fiction films.
For more tributes to Ackerman, check this one, this, and this, as well as an old blog-a-thon done in his name.
It was actually the late 70's version with Donald Sutherland and Leonard Nimoy that I first saw. I loved it. Then I was able to check this one out. It is certainly a classic. There are have a lot of crappy remakes and rip-offs over the years. It doesn't get any better than this. Great review.
'PASSION' MIGHT PLAY VENICE FEST
-
*DE PALMA, MALICK, ANDERSON AMONG DIRECTORS MENTIONED BY NEW ARTISTIC
DIRECTOR*
*The Hollywood Reporter's Eric J. Lyman* reports today that *Alberto Barber...
Cult-TV Watch: Robby the Robot
-
What a hunk…*of metal.*
Robby the Robot is not merely a movie star, he’s a Hollywood icon. For a
generation of film-goers and cult-tv watchers, Robb...
LAMB Acting School 101: Cate Blanchett
-
CS, of Big Thoughts from a Small Mind, here with all the submissions for
our LAMB Acting School 101 feature on *Cate Blanchett*. Huge thanks to all
the sit...
Years of the Beast
-
Years of the Beast
United States – 1981
Director – D. Paul Thomas
Gospel Films, 1988, VHS
Run Time – 1 hour, 38 minutes
The opening credits blink on ove...
PDF of One Big Soul
-
A pdf version is available for sale.. but, if you bought the hard copy, or preordered it and waiting for delivery, please feel free to drop me an email and I...
Upcoming Screenings: June 2012
-
While many of us discovered Canuxploitation films through late night TV
screenings and VHS rentals, there’s still something special about catching
a locall...
TMT: “Good!”
-
This is the next entry in a Theatre… a Movie… and a Time series that was
begun here. I’d been holding this one back for a while, waiting for
something to s...
Under Capricorn
-
Alfred Hitchcock's Under Capricorn is one of the director's more divisive
films, but it certainly doesn't deserve its unflattering reputation. This
lavish ...
98. Up Pompeii 1969-1970
-
by Allan Fish (UK 1969-1970 452m) DVD2 What did you expect, wit? p David
Croft, Sydney Lotterby d David Croft w Talbot Rothwell, Sid Colin
Frankie Ho...
Let There Be Light (1946)
-
Director: John Huston By Marilyn Ferdinand This past October, I started my
2011 Chicago International Film Festival coverage with a review of a
harrowing d...
Aur Onnad Meren Sir Christopher Lee
-
Otherwise known as “Happy Birthday” in Elvish, since our celebrant is
fluent in pretty much every language on Earth and Middle-Earth. Let’s raise
a pipe an...
The Fake Magazines of Blade Runner
-
Over at *The Atlantic*, Alexis Madrigal tracks down and displays some of
the fake magazines used in Ridley Scott's great film *Blade Runner*. Worth
a look....
Review: City of the Lost
-
[image: City of the Lost]
City of the Lost by Stephen Blackmoore
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I love pulp. I especially love well-written pulp, and this is g...
Come Drink with Me (1966)
-
Directed by King Hu. Starring Cheng Pei-Pei ("Golden Swallow"), Yueh Hua("Drunken Cat"), Chen
Hung Lieh ("Jade Faced Tiger"), and Li Yunzhong ("Smiling Tige...
Film Review: CYBORG (1989, Albert Pyun)
-
Stars: 4 of 5.
Running Time: 86 minutes.
Notable Cast or Crew: Jean-Claude Van Damme, Deborah Richter (HILL STREET
BLUES, SQUARE DANCE), Vincent Klyn (POIN...
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield...
-
Dear Readers,
I apologize for the lack of content lately, but as summer inches nearer and
nearer I look forward to the sunshine and no work because my time...
Nosferatu at 90: Who Was Max Schreck?
-
His very name is the German word for "terror". Perhaps this was one of the
reasons why many believed it to be a pseudonym--surely no actor known for
playi...
Criminal Movies at Flights, Fights and Movie Nights
-
I'm very pleased to announce that Criminal Movies is featured this week
on Flights, Fights and Movie Nights, as part of Bubbawheat's very cool
Follow Frida...
Escape from New York (1981)
-
*
*
*Title: *Escape from New York (1981)
*Director: *John Carpenter
*Cast: *Kurt Russell, Lee Van Cleef, Ernest Borgnine, Donald Pleasence,
Isaac Hayes,...
Tracy Reed [1942-2012]
-
It's *FAB FRIDAY*, but it arrives with little fanfare and a certain tinge
of sadness as we look at one of the bright, shining stars from the world of
*Gerr...
The Organizer (1964) Mario Monicelli
-
“The Organizer” is a tough film to describe. Is it a tale of exploited
textile workers fighting for better working conditions? A dark comedy? A
human drama...
Assault - Anschlag bei Nacht
-
And...those Germans manage to get something right, using the most righteous Tyler
Stout-drawn *Assault on Precinct 13 *Mondo poster artwork for their Blu-ra...
Flight of the Valkyrie!
-
*"Live fast, fight well and have a beautiful ending."* The statuesque *Sybil
Danning* - also known as St. Exmin of the Valkyrie in Roger Corman's 1980
spa...
A new Joseph W. Sarno Collection is on the way!
-
Joseph W. Sarno's landmark film *Inga*, as well as its solid sequel *The
Seduction of Inga*, have been out of print on DVD for a number of years now
so the...
The Conversations: Michael Haneke
-
After an unusually lengthy delay, The Conversations series is back with,
well, an usually long discussion – even by our unusually long standards. This
ed...
For You I Die (1947)
-
Georgia: ‘Maybe you’ve got something. (He’s) almost like having a wild
animal for a pet’.
Hope: ‘You make me sick’.
Convict Johnny Coulter (Paul Langt...
Dragon Tattoo Cinematography
-
*David Fincher's films, especially so in his early years, have reflexively
been labelled flashy and stylish; after all, he was and forever will be the
MTV ...
Boom!
-
Boom, indeed! There is a lot of action in Hasbro’s movie, *Battleship*, but
you have to sit through a painful thirty minutes before the action gets
starte...
Just Plain Something: Alfred Hitchcock's Rope (1948)
-
This post is the SBBN entry for the *2012 For the Love of Film Blogathon*,
dedicated to raising funds to allow the 1923 film *The White Shadow*, much
of w...
The Lone March Of Being Special
-
We all make our lives into our own personal mythologies. The songs we know
by heart, the films we’ve seen countless times, the fond memories we have
of a ...
For the Love of Film III: Rear Window (1954)
-
by Tony Dayoub
*This post is a considerable reworking of a piece I posted on 3/20/09. It's
also a contribution to For the Love of Film: The Film Preservat...
Retro Shock Round-Up
-
Despite its avid and enduring fanbase, *Dark Shadows* never caught my
interest, even as a kid, but yet several of producer/director Dan Curtis'
other genr...
Acknowledgements
-
No book ever arrives without help, not even one so humble as this. This is
only the first draft of *Son Of Danse Macabr*e and by the time I am
finished...
Bullhead
-
“*Wounds** create monsters and you are wounded.**”*
The above is one of my favorite lines from *Shutter Island*and it ran
through my mind all throughout...
America's first family
-
*NOTE:* Ranked No. 19 on my all-time top 100 of 2007
*KATIE COURIC*: What is your favorite movie?
*SEN. BARACK OBAMA*: Oh, I think it would have to be *Th...
Dark Shadows trailer
-
I spent a lot of time on the set of this last year and you'll read all
about it nearer the film's release. For now, enjoy this...
Secure Immaturity: A Preview, Part 2
-
Here is part two of my four part preview of my recently published book,
Secure Immaturity. You can purchase the book here, here, or here. You can
also re...
Santa's Last Stand Holiday Greeting Card
-
On the heels of yesterday's free holiday greeting cards, today's cards cost
a paltry $3 apiece, but are no less awesome.
Whereas yesterday's cards feature...
Mei Actually Met a Ghost — Totoro!
-
“Actually our work depends on how much we can appropriate from other
people’s work! Painting, music, films, literature … it’s all grist for the
mill. We th...
INTWINPEAKS.COM STORE
-
"LYDECKER VET CLINIC" T-SHIRT NOW FOR SALE!
Where's Waldo? Well, at Dr. Lydeckers vet Clinic, of course! This screen
printed tee spotlights the clinic logo...
NEW BLOG IN TOWN
-
I discovered a brand new blog earlier today, and it's certainly one I'll
follow with relish. Johnny Vincent - author of the wonderful "An
Alternative Derby...
It was actually the late 70's version with Donald Sutherland and Leonard Nimoy that I first saw. I loved it. Then I was able to check this one out. It is certainly a classic. There are have a lot of crappy remakes and rip-offs over the years. It doesn't get any better than this. Great review.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Keith! Yeah, this version is my fave but I've really begun to warm up to the '70s take which is amazing in its own right.
ReplyDelete