With The Bourne Ultimatum (2007) came a satisfying conclusion to the
popular spy franchise as its protagonist finally came to terms with who he was
and how he came to be a government-trained assassin. Never one to let a
lucrative franchise die, Universal Pictures soon started to develop yet another
installment. However, Matt Damon and Paul Greengrass – Ultimatum’s star and director respectively – felt that there was no
more story to tell and bowed out, leaving the studio with quite a dilemma. So,
they went back to the architect of the series, screenwriter Tony Gilroy. He had
written the first draft for Ultimatum
before two other writers were hired while he tried his hand at directing. He
had made waves in the press about not being particularly thrilled with the
direction the third film had taken and so I’m sure he saw The Bourne Legacy (2012) as a chance to make this franchise his own
and no doubt itching to bounce back after the lackluster box office of his last
film Duplicity (2009).
The problem Gilroy faced was
getting people interested in a film no longer starring the series’ beloved lead
actor. However, he wisely cast a completely different actor with Jeremy Renner
(The Hurt Locker) who, thankfully,
doesn’t play a rehash of Jason Bourne. Gilroy also wisely acknowledges what came
before by having the ending of Ultimatum
overlap with Legacy. In doing so,
this new installment isn’t a remake but rather a reboot/sequel hybrid that
exists in the same world created in the first three films.
After Jason Bourne exposed
the United States government’s top secret operations, Blackbriar and
Treadstone, the CIA bigwigs enlist retired U.S. Air Force Colonel Eric Byer
(Edward Norton) to cover their tracks. This involves eliminating all operatives
in other clandestine undertakings, chief among them Operation Outcome. It is
one of the Department of Defense’s black ops programs that provides agents with
green pills that enhance their physical skills and blue pills that enhance
their mental capabilities. One by one, these agents are killed except for Aaron
Cross (Jeremy Renner), who’s been on a training exercise in the remote
wilderness of Alaska.
The CIA also tries to kill
the scientists that researched the pills by brainwashing one of them (Zeljko Ivanek) to shoot his co-workers, save Dr. Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz) who
narrowly survives. This is a chilling scene as Gilroy ratchets up the tension
with the killer coldly gunning scientists down like some kind of mild-mannered
(yet frighteningly lethal) Manchurian Candidate. Naturally, Byer and his crew
create a cover story for the media of just another crazed rampage by a lone
gunman. As it turns out, Marta originally administered Aaron’s meds and so he
seeks her out to get more pills and get some answers, while Byer tries to kill
them. Once they are on the run, Gilroy cranks up the paranoia factor as simple
tasks like boarding a plane are a nerve-wracking experience as any fellow
passenger could be an incognito government operative sent to kill them.
Aaron Cross is a much
chattier character than the taciturn Bourne and, unlike him, Aaron knows
exactly who he is. Once a good soldier, he now questions what he’s doing and
why he needs to be dependent on these pills. This latter dilemma manifests
itself more and more as the film goes on with Aaron conveying, at times, the
desperation of a junkie looking for his next fix. With The Bourne Legacy, Renner completes a trifecta of high-profile
action films that include Mission:
Impossible – Ghost Protocol (2011) and The
Avengers (2012). The supporting roles he had in those two films were just
warm-ups for Legacy where he finally
gets to headline his own big, Hollywood blockbuster and pulls it off.
Rachel Weisz’s Marta is not
the damsel in distress she initially appears to be as the scientist quickly
acclimates to her predicament – being on the run with Aaron – and even helps
him take out the occasional bad guy. Not surprisingly, Aaron and Marta’s
relationship is initially an abrasive one as he demands more pills and answers
from her, but she soon realizes that without his help she will most certainly
wind up dead before the day is out. It is an uneasy alliance that you would
expect from two people thrown together in a desperate situation but over the
course of the film they learn to trust each other. Weisz plays a convincing
scientist, adept at spouting the technical jargon that comes with the role, but
she also has some touching scenes with Renner as his character becomes as
dependent on her as she is on him. The
Bourne Legacy is a nice change of pace for the actress who hasn’t been in
an action-oriented franchise since The
Mummy films.
Interestingly, the idea of
drug-induced government operatives eerily echoes, albeit on a much larger
scale, a storyline in the fourth season of the television show Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Buffy falls in
love with a college student by the name of Riley who is actually a
pharmaceutically-enhanced government agent, and much like in the Bourne films, this top secret operation
is eventually exposed and then covered up by the government. Once Riley
realizes the true nature of the operation, he goes rogue and even begins to
feel the detrimental effects of the drugs he was on – his pain receptors shut
down and he must seek treatment. Sound familiar? Now, genetically enhanced
government operatives are nothing new. Comic book superhero Captain America is
also enhanced through genetic engineering but the similarities between The Bourne Legacy and this storyline from
Buffy the Vampire Slayer are quite
striking.
For those not crazy about Paul
Greengrass’ frenetic, often disorienting hand-held camera action sequences in The Bourne Supremacy (2004) and Ultimatum, will be happy to know that Legacy is, by and large, devoid of them.
Gilroy shows a good sense of geography and skill at choreography during these
scenes, in particular, a dynamic and tense battle in Marta’s home between her
and Aaron and a team of assassins sent to kill them. With this sequence – and
others – Gilroy creates a real sense of danger and scary intensity as one feels
that Aaron and Marta’s lives are really at risk.
The Bourne Legacy could be seen as an opportunistic cashgrab by a studio afraid to let a
lucrative franchise lie dormant but I don’t think Tony Gilroy sees it this way.
In addition to delivering a rousing spy thriller, he raises some interesting
questions about the culpability of pharmaceutical companies that research and
create performance enhancing drugs and this is touched on in an early
conversation between Aaron and Marta where he chastises her for claiming
ignorance over the true purpose of the drugs she helped create, pointing out
that they control him. Gilroy’s skill at writing smart dialogue comes into play
during this scene and throughout the entire film as he creates an intelligent
and exciting thriller that opens up the world he first helped create in The Bourne Identity (2002). That being
said, he doesn’t deviate from the template established in the first film as our
heroes are tracked with state-of-the-art surveillance technology by government
officials barking orders in a control room all the while the protagonists
traverse the globe looking for answers and evading the bad guys. While, Legacy is not as good as the first three
films – Matt Damon was just too good at eliciting our sympathies and, at the
time, those films were a fresh alternative to the Bond franchise – it is very
well done and a promising start for a new series of films with a new
protagonist to root for.
Fine review, J.D. I think you covered this film's strengths quite well. The stellar action sequence at Marta's home was magnificent. I admired Gilroy's touch with the politics of those in-charge playing CYA and justifying themselves with such sheer smugness as to ring so damn true, as well. That said, there was still some things that frustrated me with the film. Some scenes played out too much -- I can't say I'm a fan of Gilroy's brother doing the editing. Also, the Eveready Bunny aspect of the baddie introduced too near the end of film was almost silly, along with that the head-scratching finale just didn't do it for me. David Strathairn and Joan Allen cameos were a little bit of a waste, as well. I will watch it again once out on disc, though. Thanks.
ReplyDeletele0pard13:
ReplyDeleteYeah, the assassin that went after our heroes towards the end of the film lacked any kind of personality and came off almost like an unkillable Terminator but the ending was obviously setting up future films but yeah it did seem a tad abrupt?