BLOGGER'S NOTE: This post is part of The Sword and Sandal Blogathon over at the Moon in Gemini blog.
Created by Robert E. Howard, the character of Conan the Barbarian first appeared in a series of sword and sorcery stories published in pulp magazines, like Weird Tales in 1932. The success of these early stories inspired Howard to complete 21 stories before he committed suicide in 1936. These tales were set during the fictional “Hyborian Age,” which occurred after the fall of Atlantis. Conan was often described as a muscular yet agile man known for his tactical abilities as much as his brawn. Throughout the stories, he wandered the world, getting into adventures under a variety of guises: thief, outlaw, mercenary, and pirate.
Created by Robert E. Howard, the character of Conan the Barbarian first appeared in a series of sword and sorcery stories published in pulp magazines, like Weird Tales in 1932. The success of these early stories inspired Howard to complete 21 stories before he committed suicide in 1936. These tales were set during the fictional “Hyborian Age,” which occurred after the fall of Atlantis. Conan was often described as a muscular yet agile man known for his tactical abilities as much as his brawn. Throughout the stories, he wandered the world, getting into adventures under a variety of guises: thief, outlaw, mercenary, and pirate.
It wasn’t until 1970s that
plans for a cinematic adaptation began with a young Oliver Stone hired to write
the screenplay. The film’s development hit a rocky period until the late ‘70s
when John Milius was hired as director and Arnold Schwarzenegger was cast as
the titular character. The result was Conan the Barbarian (1982), a violent action/adventure film that was embodied the
spirit of Howard’s stories as much at its director’s own thematic
preoccupations. It was a box office success and helped launch Schwarzenegger’s international
career.
“Let me tell you of the days
of high adventure,” intones the grizzled voiceover of the film’s narrator
(Mako) before Basil Poledouris’ rousing, muscular score kicks in, playing over
the opening credits, which sees Conan’s father (William Smith) crafting a
mighty impressive sword. Conan and his family are Cimmerians who believe in the
god Crom. In a nice scene, Conan’s father tells his son of Crom and instills in
the boy the belief that you can trust no one in this life, only the steel of
your sword.
A band of warriors known as
the Vanir attack Conan’s village and slaughter its inhabitants. Conan’s father
fights bravely, but is felled by overwhelming numbers. Conan’s mother
(Nadiuska) is killed defending her son by Thulsa Doom (James Earl Jones),
leader of the Vanir and head of the snake-worshipping cult Set. Conan is taken
and chained to something called the Wheel of Pain (which basically involves
pushing a large object around in a circle) for fifteen long years with other
children until only he remains having grown into a very strong man. Conan is
then taken from there and forced to become a pit fighter where he becomes adept
at hand-to-hand combat and proficient in all kinds of weapons.
Conan (Arnold
Schwarzenegger) is educated in philosophy so that when asked, “What is best in
life?” he responds with the immortal line, “To crush your enemies, see them
driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.” For Conan these
are words to live by and when he is eventually and inexplicably set free, the
Cimmerian does just that. With the first half hour of the film, Milius does an
excellent job of introducing Conan and his world – a harsh and unforgiving
place where only the strong survive. It is a world wrought with danger and
populated with colorful characters most of whom are not to be trusted, like the
witch that seduces Conan only to transform into a wild creature during sex. I
like that Milius takes the time to show how Conan becomes a skilled fighter and
builds himself up from nothing. In doing so, we get to know the character and
empathize with him.
Conan sets out to find
Thulsa Doom and kill him, thereby avenging his parents’ deaths. Along the way,
he meets and befriends Subotai, the Mongol (Gerry Lopez) and an archer, and
Valeria (Sandahl Bergman), a beautiful master thief. Like any good quest story,
the journey is not an easy one and Conan is plagued by both external and
internal dangers. He is pushed to the very limits of his physical endurance.
Only when he can conquer his own fears can he complete his goal.
Unlike a lot of contemporary
fantasy films that are augmented significantly by CGI, the world in Conan the Barbarian is tangible and
real. As a result, it is more believable and Milius makes sure to immerse us in
it with all kinds of sights and sounds, like the noisy marketplace that Conan,
Subotai and Valeria wander through, that creates a world that you feel actually
existed. This extends to the supernatural elements as well, which are done with
practical effects and this gives them a texture that still holds up. This is
evident in the sequence where Conan and his allies infiltrate a Set temple to
steal a valuable gem, which awakens a giant snake that the barbarian must
fight. Milius intercuts this with a Set ritual, which gives us some insight
into their practices. More importantly, this sequence demonstrates what adept
thieves Subotai and Valeria are and the unique skills they bring to the table.
The snake is an impressive sight and one really gets a sense that Conan is in
peril and I like how he doesn’t mess around with the creature, killing it
outright when he gets the chance.
Milius wisely limits
then-relative newcomer Arnold Schwarzenegger to the amount of dialogue he has
to say and utilizes his considerable physical abilities to tremendous effect.
The actor uses his body language to convey Conan’s feelings, which, admittedly,
are pretty limited. That being said, Schwarzenegger certainly looks the part,
which is obviously a crucial component of the role, but it is also how the
actor carries himself throughout the film, in the way he walks or fights. He is
committed fully to the part and takes it seriously. As a result, we believe
that he is the character. This is why no one has inhabited the role as well
since this film (including Schwarzenegger in the watered-down sequel). He also
provides the occasional moment of levity (some of intentional, some not) in an
otherwise serious film. For example, there’s a bit where Conan tries to
infiltrate the Set cult as one of its priests and this is pretty amusing
because he looks so out of place with his hulking frame. This seems a bit out
of character from how Conan is portrayed in Howard’s stories, but Milius does
try to justify this by showing that the barbarian has gotten foolishly
over-confident with success and blinded by his desire to kill Doom. These
moments of comedy would be a brief taste of what Schwarzenegger would be
capable of in later films, from cheesy one-liners in action films, like Commando (1985) and Predator (1987), to flat out comedies like Twins (1988).
Sandahl Bergman is
Schwarzenegger’s ideal foil, playing a fierce warrior woman that ends up
falling in love with Conan. He does so because of her impressive fighting
skills and cunning thieving abilities. And yet, the actress doesn’t play Valeria
as an uncaring killing machine. Her relationship with Conan humanizes the
character and Bergman conveys just the right mix of toughness and vulnerability
– something that was sorely missing from the sequel and the remake. It doesn’t
hurt that Bergman is a stunning beauty as well, which only adds to the appeal
of Valeria.
Despite being outfitted with
ridiculous-looking long hair, James Earl Jones is a suitably imposing Thulsa
Doom. His famous deep, booming voice also enhances the actor’s performance, which
is very theatrical in nature. This is evident in the monologue Doom gives when
lecturing Conan on the nature of strength and power.
In the mid-1970s, film
producer Ed Pressman was shown some of Frank Frazetta's paintings of Conan the
Barbarian – the illustrator that helped revitalize interest in the character
during the 1960s. Pressman thought that Conan might be right for a film
adaptation. After meeting and being impressed by bodybuilder turned actor
Arnold Schwarzenegger at a rough screening of Pumping Iron (1977), he envisioned the Austrian as Conan. However,
it took from 1975 to 1977 for the legal issues to be untangled so that the film
rights could be secured.
In 1977, Marvel Comics
editor Roy Thomas was hired to write the screenplay and artist John Buscema
worked on pre-production drawings. Both men had worked on hundreds of Conan
comic books during the ‘70s. Pressman finally convinced Schwarzenegger to star
in the film and a tentative budget was set at $2.5 million. At this point,
Paramount Pictures offered to provide the money, but wanted a new script
written by Oliver Stone, fresh from winning an Academy Award for writing Midnight Express (1978). He based his
script on Conan stories, “Black Colossus,” and “A Witch Shall Be Born,” but
deviated significantly from Howard’s mythos by setting the story in a
post-apocalyptic future world. However, this approach escalated the estimated
budget to $40 million. In addition, the search for a director was taking longer
than expected with John Frankenheimer, Alan Parker and Ralph Bakshi considered.
At one point, Ridley Scott was set to direct and then was dropped when John
Milius agreed to direct.
At some point, Paramount was
no longer involved and Milius was hired. He rewrote Stone’s script, secured
financing from Dino De Laurentiis, and began pre-production work. Milius read
Stone’s script and did not like it, but loved the character and the concept. According
to Milius, he felt kinship with Howard’s worldview: “Howard and I have the same
view of civilization. A skeptical one.” He felt that what Stone wrote had a lot
of spirit and liked the freedom of its images. While working on the script,
Milius drew inspiration from several Conan stories, including “The Thing in the
Crypt”, “Tower of the Elephant”, and “Queen of the Black Coast.” He
incorporated a few elements from them into the script and “tried constantly to
work little pieces of the stories in whenever possible.” For example, he based
the character of Valeria on Belit from “Queen of the Black Coast,” but the name
came from the “Red Nails” story. He was also determined to deliver an R-rated
sword and sorcery epic with plenty of bloody violence, including beheadings,
dismemberments, and stabbings. Milius began writing the script in 1978 and
spent nine months working on it.
To prepare for the film,
Milius commissioned research papers on medieval snake and assassination cults,
studied Mongol history and checked out ancient warfare and weaponry. He
recruited collaborators that brought unique talents to the table. Chief among them
was cartoonist and commercial illustrator Ron Cobb who had cut his teeth doing
design work on genre films like John Carpenter’s Dark Star (1974), George Lucas’ Star
Wars (1977), and Ridley Scott’s Alien
(1979).
For Conan the Barbarian, he was made production designer and ended up
creating over 57 interior and exterior sets, and converted two warehouses and
an aircraft hangar into soundstages. During filming, he also supervised special
effects and second unit direction. His main task was to create the fictional
Hyborian Age on film, which included designing all of the architecture, most
notably the Tower of Set. He designed the giant serpent and its tunnel lair in
proportion to Schwarzenegger. The snake itself was an impressive 34 feet in
length and approximately a foot-and-a-half across. Special effects supervisor
Nick Allder constructed a cantilevered skeleton with a control platform that
operated through the snake body to avoid visible outside wires. The result was
a big and strong enough contraption that could actually push Schwarzenegger
around while also paying tribute to Frank Frazetta’s iconic Conan paintings,
which were used as inspiration for this sequence.
When it came to casting,
early on Raquel Welch and Sean Connery were considered for the roles of Valeria
and Thulsa Doom, respectively. In addition to Schwarzenegger, Milius cast
Sandahl Bergman (recommended by none other than Bob Fosse!) and Gerry Lopez
because they were physically adept with backgrounds in dance, and surfing,
respectively. According to the director, “ordinarily actors wouldn’t have done
those things because of their preconceived ideas going in.” Furthermore, the
three lead actors “seemed better in the roles than anyone else, but there was
always that doubt. I cast people who seemed to be the characters in the script.” Milius wanted the swordplay to
look authentic and for the actors to do most of their own stunt work. To his
end, he had the cast train for six months in broadsword fighting, kendo,
horseback riding, and stunt work.
Principal photography was
originally scheduled to begin in Yugoslavia in 1980, but the production had to
pull out due to political and practical reasons. Eventually, Spain was chosen
because of its excellent production facilities, diverse landscapes, and very
experienced film crews. In addition, Milius had previously shot The Wind and the Lion (1975) there and
was familiar with the country. Filming began in Spain on January 7, 1981 and
lasted 19 weeks. To cut costs, the filmmakers staged all of the sorcery live
and on location, which meant utilizing very few blue screens and no animation
with many elaborate sets actually built, sometimes in conjunction with models
and miniatures.
According to Cobb, Milius
often directed from a motorcycle and worked fast, averaging two or three takes
per shot and pushing for 15-20 camera set-ups a day. By many accounts, the
shoot was an eventful one with several dicey moments, For example, in the scene
where Conan emerges from a cave brandishing a newly found sword, he was to be
confronted by a pack of hungry wolves. They were actually dogs and one of the
larger ones jumped his cue and broke from the pack, hitting Schwarzenegger in
the chest, which sent them both tumbling over a ten-foot cliff! The actor
escaped seriously injury, but this incident, early on in filming, set the tone
for the rest of principal photography. Never one to hold back, the director had
a sometimes contentious relationship with De Laurentiis, comparing working for
the mogul to “the foreign legion … His methods are … unsound. Dino’s just like
bad weather, he’ll pass, but meanwhile you contend with it.” This may explain
why Milius did not direct the sequel, Conan
the Destroyer (1984).
Predictably,
Conan the Barbarian was trashed by
most mainstream critics with the notable exception of Roger Ebert who gave the
film three out of four stars and felt that it was “a very nearly perfect
visualization of the Conan legend,” and “a triumph of production design, set
decoration, special effects and makeup.” However, in his review for The New York Times, Vincent Canby wrote,
“As Conan, Mr. Schwarzenegger looks overdressed even when he is undressed, but
then there is no way he can unzip that overdeveloped physique and slip into something
more comfortable.” Newsweek
magazine’s Jack Kroll wrote, “The sad thing is that there’s so little fun to Conan, its violence is so cheerless and
styleless. Its action sequences seem edited defensively, to make sure there’s
not too much blood, not too many decapitations, rather than for physical
exhilaration and electric energy.” In his review for the Globe and Mail, Jay Scott wrote, “Anything that can be said against
it can be said for it: the picture is an excessively brutal adventure comic
book. An excessively brutal adventure comic book is exactly what is has set out
to be – a medieval Heavy Metal.”
Finally, the Washington Post’s Gary
Arnold wrote, “The image of awesome, hyperbolic muscularity imposed by Frazetta
is also meant to dominate the movie version, where it’s transformed into
unintentional nonsense, thanks to the unfailing cloddishness of director John
Milius.”
Milius’ direction is
refreshingly straight-forward and doesn’t distract with unnecessary stylistic
flourishes. Everything he does is in service of the story and the characters.
That being said, the action sequences are well-staged – exciting and visceral
with attention paid to what is going on and where everyone is so that we are
never confused unlike a lot of action films today, which are edited within an
inch of their lives. The action depicted on-screen is further enhanced by Basil
Poledouris’ score, which is epic when it needs to be and intimate during the
more reflective moments. It is a crucial component as to why Conan the Barbarian works as a rousing
action/adventure film.
With Conan the Barbarian, Milius has created a film that doesn’t water
down the violence or any of the other unabashedly pulpy elements that make it
one of the best fantasy films ever made. Despite its success, Milius did not
return for the sequel, Conan the
Destroyer, which diluted the violence for a younger audience, but it was
also missing that special something that Milius brought to his film. He managed
to capture the spirit of Conan in a way that no one has done since, including
the rather bland remake. A crucial ingredient that makes Conan the Barbarian superior to other films is that we care about
what happens to Conan as well as Valeria, which makes his quest that much more
personal. He is going after the bad guys to avenge loved ones and it is this
personal element that resonates. Credit must go to Milius for getting us
involved in these characters’ lives. He takes the time to have them reflect on
what they’ve done and what they’ve lost. It’s not all wall-to-wall action, but
also features moments that give us important insight into the characters, like
Conan who is depicted as more than just a brutal killing machine.
SOURCES
Bruzenak, Ken. “The Making
of an Adventure Epic – Conan the
Barbarian.” Prevue #46.
Honeycutt, Kirk. “Milius the
Barbarian.” American Film. May 1982.
Sammon, Paul M. “Conan the Barbarian – Filming Robert E.
Howard’s Sword and Sorcery Epic.” Cinefantastique. April 1982.
Sammon, Paul M. “Milius the
Director.” Cinefantastique. April 1982.
Steranko, Jim. “Milius.” Prevue
#48.
Wow, I can't believe wat some of those critics said, like that guy that said that it wasn't bloody or violent enough? What movie did he watch? This film is utlra violent, with many decapitations and plenty of blood and how in the hell can they knock on Millius's direction? As you say, it's spot on! What he did with this film was make Conan's world real, which nobody has been able to do. Not the sequel, not the remake...let's hope that Arnold gets to do that "King Conan" movie he's been talking about....it would be awesome! Nice bit of info there about Millius directing the film from a motorcycle! Pretty cool!
ReplyDeleteTerrific writeup, J.D.– a great and informative overview on the film – and you're definitely right about the atmosphere being immersive and real (and the link between that and our caring about the characters).
ReplyDeleteAlso, as Francisco pointed out– love the detail about Milius directing via motorcycle!
Nice review of one of my favorite fantasy films of the 1980s. I've actually seen this movie getting some heat lately, and I'm always surprised by that. I think Milius really nailed the whole atmosphere and tone of the Howard stories without actually adapting them straight. His instincts on the casting were right on, and the the scope of the film is a perfect fit.
ReplyDeleteI know you mentioned it, but I have to mention the amazing musical score by Basil Poledouris. There isn't much dialogue in the film (compared to the remake it is nearly a silent film). And Poledouris' score really does much of the heavy lifting. He used actual medieval music as his base for the score (as opposed to a more classical approach like Williams took for Star Wars). The result feels more primal and powerful, but less refined - a perfect match for the film. It is easily one of my favorite film scores of the 80s. And the remake's score suffered in comparison.
I'd love to see a more faithful adaptation of one of Howard's stories created for the big screen, but sadly the remake wasn't it. That film had it's moments, but reminded me more of something I'd see on cable about ten years ago, instead of a full blown Conan story.
Just discovered your blog and I'm really enjoying it. Keep up the great work!
Francisco Gonzalez:
ReplyDeleteYeah, the critics really took Milius' CONAN to task. Ouch. But the film's legacy has certainly outlasted these reviews, hasn't it?
I too am pulling for Schwarzenegger's KING CONAN. I hope they get a good director. I guess it is hoping too much for Milius to return, but somehow I don't think that is in the cards.
Sean Gill:
Thanks, Sean! Yeah, the whole mood, atmosphere and vibe of Milius' film is fantastic and really gets you involved in what is happening. That seems to be missing from most contemporary fantasy films with the notable exceptions of Jackson's Tolkien adaptations and the HARRY POTTER films.
Roman J. Martel:
I agree that Milius' film isn't a very faithful adaptation of Howard's stories, but he does manage to capture the tone of them. I too would LOVE to see someone do a more faithful take on the material. Maybe some day. And yes, isn't Poledouris' soundtrack awesome? It really is a big reason why the film works as well as it does. All of the musical cues really enhance the on-screen action so well.
Excellent post. I'm looking forward to Schwarzenegger reprising his role in the long awaited King Conan sequel.
ReplyDeleteAs am I. Such a shame they didn't involve Milius, though.
DeleteGreat post! I was going to nitpick and say Thomas and Buscema's Conan output by the time the film was released (including the movie adaptation) was closer to hundreds of pages over hundreds of issues by 1982 (issues #25 - 119, give or take a few fill-in artists). But I'd forgotten the daily newspaper strip (1978 - 81), a bunch of Savage Sword of Conan issues by '82, Savage Tales 1 - 5, the Giant-Size Conan comics, and maybe a few other comics I used to own.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, here's a cool bit of fun - the intro to Cauldron's interesting, flawed Conan (The Dark Axe), a PC and console game from 2003 that never came out in the west:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JpG8rW0mpY
Thanks for the link! Very cool...
DeleteI've never given this movie a try, but you've given me reason to give (at least the original) a chance! I've never understood why writers and directors of action films so frequently neglect character development, as it's what makes us care about who wins. I'm glad to hear Milius did so--
ReplyDeleteHe sure did. This version is waaaaay better than the crap remake a few years back. Milius really made it his own and subsequent incarnations have lacked that touch.
DeleteWonderful post...I've had this movie on my To Watch list for years but just never got to it...I think it is high time I watch it.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely! EnjoY!
DeleteFascinating behind-the-scenes look at this iconic film. I've only seen clips of this film, but I agree that it has a realistic feel (vs our CGI obsession these days which always feels somehow fake). Thanks for sharing all this research with us. :)
ReplyDeleteYou are more than welcome. I definitely prefer practical effects over CGI any day. But that's not to say some CGI is well done if integrated properly.
DeleteI prefer Conan the Destroyer to this one, but both are great actioners.
ReplyDeleteReally? I felt that DESTROYER watered Conan down way too much.
DeleteWhat an information-packed review! I love the behind-the-scenes tidbits.
ReplyDeleteI also miss the more realistic action/adventure movies. CGI effects can be great, but they can also be distracting at time.
Thanks so much for contributing to the blogathon!
Thank you! I agree with you re: CGI. I don't mind if they are integrated properly into a film but so many times they are distracting or obvious.
DeleteNice article and your critic thinking is awesome!
ReplyDelete