Anticipation was high among
horror fans when it was announced that three giants of the genre were going to
collaborate together on a film. Author Stephen King, director George Romero and
makeup effects wizard Tom Savini decided to pay tribute to the classic EC horror comic books from the 1950s with an anthology film called Creepshow (1982). Coming off the
personally fulfilling, but commercial failure of Knightriders (1981), I’m sure Romero was eager to move on to
something else and hooking up with King made sense. The two men had originally
met over the possibility of collaborating on an adaptation of the author’s
novel Salem’s Lot, but when the film
rights were sold off to television, Romero moved on.
Making a horror anthology was
a bit of a risky gamble at the time. They were all the rage in the 1970s with
Hammer and Amicus cranking out films like The
House That Dripped Blood (1971), Tales
from the Crypt (1972), and From
Beyond the Grave (1973), but by the end of the decade they had fallen out
of favor. King and Romero wanted to bring these kinds of films back while also
celebrating the horror comic books, like House
of Mystery and The Vault of Horror
that they grew up enjoying as kids. The project was given a decent budget and populated
with a mix of up-and-coming movie stars and veteran character actors. While
receiving only mixed reviews, it was a sleeper hit.
Creepshow is bookended by a boy (Joe King) being chastised by 1980s horror
movie mainstay Tom Atkins for reading horror comic books. The overbearing
patriarch throws his son’s issue of Creepshow
in the trash and the rest of the film depicts various stories from its pages.
The first story is “Father’s
Day” that sees a family of wealthy snobs waiting for their Aunt Bedelia Grantham
(Viveca Lindfors), the rich matriarch who is rumored to have murdered her
father, Nathan (Jon Lormer) on, what else, Father’s Day. Nathan was a real
piece of work, angrily demanding his cake over and over until, out of
frustration, Bedelia brains him with an ashtray. It’s Father’s Day again and
Nathan (John Amplas) rises from the grave demanding his cake once more. The
undead patriarch, of course, evokes Romero’s zombie films, but Tom Savini’s
makeup isn’t a rehash of Dawn of the Dead
(1979). The look of undead Nathan is in keeping with the exaggerated style of
the old EC comic books.
Romero hits us right up front
with all kinds of attention-grabbing style: skewed camera angles, garish Giallo
lighting (saturating shots in red or blue lighting) and employing split-screen
action like the panels in a comic book. He even evokes Night of the Living Dead (1968) ever so slightly when we see
Bedelia visit her father’s grave; the cemetery initially bathed in warm, late
afternoon light, soon becomes ominously atmospheric.
There is a nice mix of comedy
and dread with the former coming from a fantastic moment where we get to see
“serious actor” Ed Harris grooving out to some cheesy music with his wife
(Elizabeth Regan). I can’t get enough of seeing him dancing so awesomely badly
to a cheesy ‘80s song. With the exception of Harris, the rest of the Grantham
clan are a bunch of vain, selfish, obnoxious bluebloods that deserve what’s
coming to them, which makes their comeuppance at the hands of Nathan all the
more satisfying.
“The Lonesome Death of Jordy
Verrill” is easily the weakest story in Creepshow
as Stephen King, in an act of unfortunate hubris, casts himself as the
eponymous Jordy, a stereotypical dumb yokel who foolishly touches a fallen
meteorite and begins sprouting a strange, green moss-like substance that
mutates into wild vegetation all over his body. Before you can say Swamp Thing,
Jordy and his place are overwhelmed with lush green vegetation. Where the other
segments achieve the right mix of horror and humor, this one goes too far over
to the comedy side and comes across as too cartoonish.
King’s “acting” is straight
out of an Ed Wood movie – strictly amateur hour and not in a it’s-so-bad-it’s-good
kind of way. This segment is essentially a one-man show and King just isn’t
talented enough to pull it off. Romero does the best he can to keep things
interesting visually (Jordy’s place is a marvel of set design), and Savini’s
make-up job on King makes you wish that he had done the effects work on Wes
Craven’s Swamp Thing (1982).
Fortunately, Creepshow bounces back with “Something
to Tide You Over” as funnymen Ted Danson and Leslie Nielsen are cast against
type as two men at odds with each other. Harry (Danson) has been sleeping with
Richard’s (Nielsen) wife Becky (Gaylen Ross). Richard confronts Harry and takes
him out to his privately owned beach and proceeds to bury him up to his head,
waiting for the tide to come in, much like he did to his wife. It’s a pretty
unorthodox kind of revenge as is the plot twist where we see what happens to
Harry and Becky after Richard leaves them to die.
Again, Romero comes up with
some fantastic imagery, chief among them the shot of an irate Harry submerged
in water, which evokes the watery demise of Shelley Winters’ character in The Night of the Hunter (1955). Once
Richard returns home, Romero ratchets up the tension as we soon realize that
Harry and Becky are back for some vengeance of their own. Savini’s makeup effects
on the waterlogged couple are quite extraordinary and their distorted, watery
voices are unsettling. It’s great to see Leslie Nielsen shed all of his comedic
shtick to play a fairly sadistic son-of-a-bitch and he seems to relish the
change of pace. Few remember that he started off his career playing dramatic
roles because he’s so closely identified to his iconic character in the Naked Gun movies.
For me, the best story in Creepshow is “The Crate,” which focuses
on Henry Northup (Hal Holbrook), a reserved college professor, and his friend
and colleague Dexter Stanley (Fritz Weaver). Henry is married to Wilma “Billie”
Northup (Adrienne Barbeau), a boozy, overbearing shrew of a wife, who shows up
to a faculty party drunk and belligerent. Dexter is called away when a janitor
(Don Keefer) shows him a crate from an Arctic expedition dating back to 1834.
It was stored away under a staircase in the bowels of a building.
Naturally, Dexter and the
janitor decide to open the crate and they unleash a ferocious creature that
kills the hapless custodian in gruesome fashion (although, restrained for
Savini). Pretty soon, Henry and Billie run afoul of the nasty beast as Savini
gets a chance to flex his impressive makeup muscles. I can still recall seeing
pictures of the crate monster in Fangoria
around the time Creepshow came out
and being scared by it. At a young, impressionable age, it took me awhile to
see the film all the way through, but at least I read the comic book
adaptation.
What really sells the horror
in this segment is the absolutely sweaty, wild-eyed terrified reactions of
Dexter to the two deaths he witnesses. Fritz Weaver does a great job as Dexter,
never amping up his character’s anxiety too much and knowing just when to reel
things in. Holbrook is also very good at showing Henry’s transformation from
mild-mannered professor to calculating husband who plots the demise of his
domineering wife. Adrienne Barbeau is a hoot as Henry’s obnoxious wife and
looks like she’s having a blast bouncing off of Holbrook’s doormat of a
husband. It’s a juicy role that lets the veteran actress vamp it up as only she
can.
Finally, the story “They’re
Creeping Up On You!” features E.G. Marshall as Upson Pratt (perfect name for
his character), an anal-retentive neat freak businessman who lives in a sterile
apartment. He’s obsessed with eradicating his place of bugs. It’s an amusing
spin on the equally reclusive and germ-obsessed Howard Hughes fused with Ebenezer
Scrooge. All Pratt cares about is money and clearing up his “bug problem,” but
soon enough the omnipresent cockroaches have their day in a rather fitting
finale to this film.
Marshall is excellent as the curmudgeonly
germaphobe sealed up in how sterile fortress. He’s a prisoner of his own
obsessions. This segment shows what a truly skilled actor can do when he has to
carry a segment on his own, unlike King in his story. For anyone creeped out by
bugs this segment is particularly disconcerting.
George Romero first met
Stephen King when he was approached by Warner Bros. to direct an adaptation of Salem’s Lot, a novel about a small town
in Maine that is terrorized by vampires. The two men met in Maine for several
days and even though the project fell through, they kept in touch. King and
Romero wanted to work together on an adaptation of the author’s epic novel The Stand, but realized that it would
require major Hollywood studio funding to get made. In order to retain full
artistic control, they decided to make another inexpensive film first that
would make enough money to give Romero more clout with the studios.
In the summer of 1979, Romero
and his business partner and producer Richard Rubinstein met with King in Maine
to come up with ideas for an original film because it would be cheaper to make.
One idea was a series of horror “blackouts,” short sketches leading to a major
scare. Romero wanted to create five stories in five completely different
styles: one in black and white, one in color, one in 3D, and so on. However, they
decided that this approach was too experimental.
It was King that came up with
the comic book idea and the “Creepshow” title. He wrote and completed the
142-page screenplay in October 1979. The first story, “Father’s Day,” was described
as a “deliberate EC pastiche,” according to King. “The Lonesome Death of Jordy
Verrill” was an adaptation of “Weeds,” a short story King published in the May
1976 issue of Cavalier. In fact,
“Weeds” was originally written as the first chapter of a novel, but as the
story started to spread beyond Verrill’s world, King could not find any more to
say. For the film, he decided to change the tragic tone to a more comedic one.
“Something to Tide You Over”
was inspired by King’s memories of being buried up to his neck in sand as a
child and also from a film about Bluebeard the pirate being left to die below
the high tide line. “The Crate” was adapted from a short story published in the
July 1979 issue of Gallery magazine.
The story was inspired by a real crate found under the stairs in the chemistry
building at the University of Maine. What stuck in King’s mind was that the
crate had been under the stairs for a hundred years and he imagined “something
really sinister in there.” The creature in the crate was inspired by the Looney
Tunes cartoon character, the Tasmanian Devil. For the last story, King
originally had a mixture of spiders, cockroaches, beetles, and bugs that did
not even exist. However, budgetary constraints forced him to use cockroaches
exclusively.
Initially, King was not
interested in a framing story to link the five stories because he felt that
ones in past horror film anthologies were “silly and contrived.” Romero
suggested a comic book as the framing device and King agreed. The Spectre, featured
in the prologue and linking segments, was a reworking of the “Old Witch”, “The
Cryptkeeper” and other narrators from the EC comic books. Romero used King’s
first draft, making some changes with the author’s approval and input during
principal photography, which often involved rewriting dialogue.
With King’s script, a rough
budget and poster art created by EC comic book veteran artist Jack Kamen, the
filmmakers shopped the project around Hollywood. Money wasn’t an issue with
studio executives, but rather the content. They wanted creative input, which
King and Romero balked at. So, they went back to United Film Distributing, a
subsidiary of the United Artists Theater Circuit, who had backed Knightriders. They ended up financing Creepshow’s $8 million budget.
Pre-production began in early
1981 and Romero called on frequent collaborators, like makeup effects artist
Tom Savini and cinematographer Michael Gornick. The production set up offices
in Penn Hall Academy, an abandoned Pittsburgh grammar school, transforming
their gymnasium into a soundstage. Principal photography began in late July
1981. In order to give each segment its own distinct look, King and Romero
decided to employ the vibrant color scheme from the EC comic books through
heightened, saturated lighting and utilizing stylized backgrounds. With the
significant budget, Romero had the freedom to shoot on location as well as on a
soundstage. Filming lasted 17 weeks, ending in late November.
Post-production was quite
extensive with four different editors working on the five stories, a large
amount of optical work, and composing the film’s score. Originally, Romero
planned to use music from the Capitol Library (which he also used in Night of the Living Dead). He felt that
the music would work well with the film, but assistant director John Harrison
noticed the varying degrees of quality in material from the various decades and
ended up creating much of the music in the film on a synthesizer. Rick Catizone
created the animated sequences that acted as segues between segments in the
style of Kamen’s comic book pages drawn for the film.
Creepshow debuted at the 1982 Cannes Film Festival and was a rousing success
with a distribution deal made with Warner Bros. – the first time a studio would
distribute a Romero film. The
film received mixed reviews from mainstream critics. Roger Ebert gave the film
three out of four stars and wrote, “What they’ve done here is to recapture not
only the look and the storylines of old horror comics, but also the peculiar feeling
of poetic justice that permeated their pages.” In his review for The New York Times, Vincent Canby wrote,
“The best things about Creepshow are
its carefully simulated comic-book tackiness and the gusto with which some good
actors assume silly positions. Horror film purists may object to the levity even
though failed, as a lot of it is.” The Washington
Post’s Rita Kempley wrote, “What one confronts in Creepshow is five consistently stale, derivative horror vignettes
of various lengths and defects.” Newsweek
magazine’s David Ansen wrote, “Creepshow is
a faux naïf horror film: too arch to
be truly scary, too elemental to succeed as satire.” Finally, in his review for
the Globe and Mail, Jay Scott wrote, “The
Romero-King collaboration has softened both the horror and the cynicism, but
not by enough to betray the sources – Creepshow
is almost as funny and as horrible as the filmmakers would clearly love it to
be.”
If Romero was criticized for
his rather non-descript directorial style prior to Creepshow, with this film the director showed that he could turn on
the style with the best of them, cutting loose and having fun with the
material. He pays homage to the classic EC comic books from the ‘50s by
presenting a series of short stories populated by reprehensible protagonists
that get their well-deserved retribution through supernatural means. Most
horror anthologies are notoriously uneven in terms of quality and Creepshow is no different. Fortunately,
there’s only one segment that isn’t very good and that was down to casting,
while the rest of them are populated with familiar faces that seem to be having
fun inhabiting their colorful characters, which translates into fun for the
audience watching them.
Creepshow helped kick off a new wave of horror anthology films that included
the likes of Nightmares (1983), Cat’s Eye (1985), Tales from the Darkside: The Movie
(1990), and, more recently, Trick ‘r
Treat (2007), which, with its mix of horror and comedy and use of garish,
vibrant lighting, seems particularly indebted to Creepshow. While it certainly doesn’t contain the scathing social
commentary of other Romero films, it is a fun, entertaining romp – a cleansing
of the cinematic palette if you will, before he moved on to tackle the third installment
of his Dead trilogy with Day of the Dead
(1985).
SOURCES
Gagne, Paul R. “Creepshow: Masters of the Macabre.” Cinefantastique.
September-October 1982.
Further reading: Check out Sean Gill's excellent take on Creepshow over at his blog.
totally forgot that ed harris was in this, knew everyone else... thank you for the post. where is my cake?
ReplyDeleteVisiting part of the "Countdown to Halloween"
Jeremy H.
New Look, New Name and Same Stuff...
[Being-Retro]
Also, thought I would share this with you... this is the label I work for and we want to get a good turn out this year.. Maybe you like and then share?
13 Days of Chills [2013] Win Prizes and More!
Brought to you by "Howlin' Wolf Records", go ahead you should check it out! Remember this runs all month long and it's all about the score music from some of your favorite films and the mention of prizes doesn't hurt either.
http://www.13chills.com/
Ps. Word Verification is Awful, if you get the chance PLEASE Turn it Off and set your comment preferences to NO ANONYMOUS! If you need some help on this, please visit my site on "Stupid CAPTCHA"... I have some helpful steps.
Thanks for a lively, informative review, JD. My won favourite segment is Something To Tide You Over, though I most certainly share your enthusiasm for The Crate. Some terrific work by Tom Savini, and even the Verrill section grows on me the more I see it.
ReplyDeleteI was never a huge horror fan when I was a kid, but my buddy at school was. One day he invited me and another friend over to watch some scary movies. He picked "Creepshow" and "Vamp". So this flick is kind of special in it's own weird way to me. My first full blown horror flick. I have to say "The Crate" made the biggest impression on me, and is still my favorite. But when I recently revisited the film "Something to Tide You Over" was filled with some excellent dark humor that I had forgotten about. All in all a fun and funny horror flick and a nostalgic 80s favorite.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reviewing it and including some of that very interesting behind the scenes info.
Super fun movie, love the spooky bookends to the movie, with the kid looking at that floating skeleton thing on the window...plus, the kids delight when he sees it I think is the most disturbing thing about it....and of course, seeing Leslie Nielsen playing a villain so well!
ReplyDeleteNice piece J.D., I love this flick. It's certainly a top tier horror anthology for me, which is a subgenre I've always had a soft spot for. I'm a big fan of the Amicus stuff also, but there's a much drier sensibility at work in those and they really couldn't care any less about capturing the essence of the old comics they're ostensibly drawing from; the Romero on the other hand does a tremendous job realizing that grotesque EC aesthetic.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with you about Stephen King though, I genuinely think his is a brilliant comic performance. It's so exaggerated and over the top that it bypasses any camp potential and lands in the realm of the same kind of pure expression of mania that I associate with a Jerry Lewis. I think it also works productively for the material, in that the final moments of the segment become suddenly so dour and hopeless, his voice reduced to that pathetic gurgle, for me the sudden shift is like a punch and makes the ending more stark and haunting than if it all had rather been anchored by more low key, straightforward acting.
My brother and I have a running joke between us using the "I want my cake, Bedelia!" line. :)
ReplyDeleteAn awesome and thorough write-up, and thanks for the shout-out!
ReplyDeleteIn terms of King's performance, I do still think it possesses a kind of boneheaded genius, and the the comedy sort of prevents complete despair... can you imagine, say, a Harry Dean Stanton-type slowly decaying into a suicidal plant-man? I'd probably be weeping uncontrollably and consequently be unable to fully enjoy Leslie Nielsen torturing Sam Malone in the next segment.
Man, I haven't seen this movie in, like, forever. Thanks for reminding me to watch it again.
ReplyDeleteJeremy [Retro]:
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by!
Steve Langton:
Thanks! Yeah, The Crate segment is so well done - easily the highlight of the film, for me.
Roman J. Martel:
Thanks for stopping by. Yeah, a friend of mine got me into this film during a great summer where I really got into the horror genre in a big way and this was one of them that really stuck with me.
Francisco Gonzalez:
Yeah, Nielsen did a really good job playing a nasty guy. It still amazes me how good he is in it. Yeah, the bookends in the film are good. Always good to see Tom Atkins in there!
Drew McIntosh:
Thanks for stopping by. Yeah! I do love Amicus' anthology films. They really knew how to do them back then, but, as you so rightly point out, they really didn't capture the EC horror comic vibe like King and Romero do on CREEPSHOW.
You make quite a good defence for King's performance, but it still bothers me to no end. I do agree with you about his character's final moments. That's where the segment really hits you hard and delivers the goods.
Great observations!
Caffeinated Joe:
Nice!
Sean Gill:
Thank you, my friend!
Good point about King's performance. I guess the over-the-top nature of it balances out the utter despair of what happens to his character.
Joshua Raymond:
You are more than welcome!