Burnt out from the debacle
that was Francis Ford Coppola’s The
Cotton Club (1984) and the commercial failure of Streets of Fire (1984), Diane Lane had gone from promising A-list
actress to box office poison. Stinging from these two high profile flops and
eager to escape the media spotlight, she took some time off to regroup and
figure out what she wanted to do next. In 1987, she came roaring back with a
vengeance with two films, one of which was Lady Beware, a modest B-movie thriller that was a labor of love for its
director, Karen Arthur, but ran afoul of studio interference. While hardly a
masterpiece, it is an intriguing cinematic detour in Lane’s filmography.
Katya Yarno (Diane Lane) is
an aspiring window dresser who arrives in Pittsburgh and applies for a job at a
big department store by persistently pursuing its owner Mr. Thayer (Edward
Penn). She impresses him with her moxie as she flat-out tells him that his
window displays “suck,” but it gets her foot in the door. She soon befriends
fellow employees Lionel (Peter Nevargic) and Nan (Tyra Ferrell). Eager to
impress, Katya works late and creates quite a provocative display on her first
attempt, which gets the attention of Jack Price (Michael Woods), a hunky guy who
begins stalking Katya, watching her while she bathes, and later, her sleeping,
all from the vantage point of the fire escape on her building.
Meanwhile, Katya has a literally
steamy dream of having sex with a muscular model while naked mannequins from
her window display look on. Her fantasies fuel her work and despite the
protestations of his prudish wife, Thayer is impressed by Katya’s work, giving
her a six-month contract. In these early scenes, Lane does a nice job of
conveying Katya’s youthful enthusiasm and ambition to make it in the big city,
but with a hint of being something of a provocateur as her racy displays upset
some and excite others. The use of actual locations in and around the city
really creates a sense of place that is tangible and grounds things, which
offsets its B-movie-ness a bit.
Soon, Katya is interviewed
by Pittsburgh Magazine’s Mac Odell
(Cotter Smith, saddled with the thankless nice guy role), who not only likes
her window displays, but the young woman as well, much to the chagrin of stalker
Jack. He soon ups the ante on his tactics, harassing her on the phone and even
opening her mail. Michael Woods oozes sleaze as the creepy stalker fixated on
Lane’s character. The fact that Jack has a wife and kid (even calling Katya
while playing with his child) makes him even scarier. Director Karen Arthur
does a pretty good job of showing Jack’s gradually unsettling voyeuristic
tendencies and how they unnerve and upset Katya, preying on her insecurities. At
times, Jack’s fixation is really upsetting (especially if you’ve ever been
stalked), like when he breaks into Katya’s place and takes a bath in her tub,
even using her toothbrush (ugh!). He confidently roams around her apartment
like he owns the place and it’s not even 45 minutes in when you’re hoping that
someone takes this sicko out.
Lane is certainly not afraid
to show off her beautiful body during certain moments in the film, which only
adds to the slightly sleazy B-movie thriller vibe, but is meant to reinforce
Katya’s enticing tendencies. As the film progresses, she convincingly conveys
the stress and fear Katya experiences once Jack’s obsessive behavior makes her
life a living hell. She starts off as this confident young woman and over the
course of the film, her world is shaken by Jack’s frightening tactics and this
is shown in how it affects her work. However, Katya has an inner strength that
she is able to tap into, which helps her deal with what’s happening.
After Karen Arthur released
her second film, The Mafu Cage in
1978, she began work on Lady Beware.
Over the next eight years, “it’s had 100 homes, 17 drafts and eight writers,”
she said. The director wanted to make a movie about psychological rape, but
found that at the Hollywood studios, “the purse holders are men.” When she
shopped the project around, Arthur found that the studios wanted to make “a
violent picture,” but she was “not interested in making a picture where a woman
gets beat up. I wanted to show how a woman deals with this kind of insidious
violence.” While trying to get financial backing, she made development deals in
order to make a living, but she wasn’t actually directing any movies and tried
her hand at television, winning an Emmy for an episode of Cagney & Lacey and became the first woman to direct an American
mini-series – Crossings. She
eventually secured financing with Scotti Bros. Entertainment, an American
independent production company.
Filming was originally
announced to start in October of 1984, but for some reason was pushed back two
years. The film’s producers considered shooting in Chicago, Detroit and
Atlanta, but executive producer Lawrence Mortoff had made a previous film in
Pittsburgh and was familiar with the city. For the lead role, he considered
Elizabeth McGovern and Lori Street before going with Diane Lane. After The Cotton Club, she was tired and took
two years off in order “to get a perspective from a point of not having a
career.” She had lost her love for acting and just wanted to experience life
outside of moviemaking. Lane eventually rediscovered her desire to act and when
she was ready come back to work was offered three films: The Big Town (1987), After
the Rain, and Lady Beware.
Budgeted at $3 million,
principal photography began on July 21, 1986 on location in Pittsburgh and
ended around August 23, 1986. The production was hardly harmonious as local
crew members clashed with the film’s associate producer and first assistant
director Paula Marcus who was described as “overly aggressive and mean.” She
was not well liked by the crew. Later on, one of the local actors who worked on
the film claimed that the editors ruined it. Said thespian met Arthur a year
later and she was still upset by the experience.
Lady Beware received mixed reviews.
In his review for The New York Times,
Walter Goodman criticized the film’s ending and felt that Arthur “seems to have
given up trying to understand what is going on, for which you can’t blame her.”
The Washington Post’s Hal Hinson
wrote, “Lane does manage to convey some of the suffering inflicted by this sort
of psychological rape. Lane’s reached a fascinating point as a performer – a
place somewhere between being a woman and a girl – so that in some scenes she’s
able to come across as strikingly mature and self-possessed and, in others, as
a frightened child, small and vulnerable.” In his review for the Toronto Star, Geoff Pevere compared it
to Fatal Attraction: “Although
hampered by weak performances … poor sound dubbing and serious continuity
troubles … Lady Beware bravely
ventures much closer to the dark heart of sexual harassment than its vastly
more popular and polished contemporary.”
Lady Beware
raises the issue of the danger that women sometimes encounter when they come
across as what is perceived by some as being too provocative and how a
disturbing fixation can develop as a result – something that was not the
intention of the woman. It can make the person feel like a victim as they live
in constant fear for their life, not knowing when and where their stalker will
surface. It’s all about being in control. By harassing Katya relentlessly, Jack
makes her feel helpless and controls her through fear. Once she conquers that
fear she is able to turn the tables on him.
Lady Beware
is a potent reminder of the real danger stalkers pose and just how scary it is
for the target of their obsession. Katya has supportive co-workers and a caring
boyfriend, but none of them know how she feels and how it affects her, which
Lane conveys quite well in a surprisingly nuanced performance that, at times,
almost transcends the film’s thriller genre clichés. Of course, this is all
conveyed under the auspices of a B-movie thriller with some of the genre’s
lurid trappings, some clunky dialogue and scenery-chewing acting. This is
glaringly apparent during the last 30 minutes as Lane succumbs to
cringe-inducing histrionics that are meant to show Katya’s increasingly upset
nature and how much she’s affected by what Jack’s doing to her by isolating
herself from everyone as a form of protection, but it comes across as the
actress going over the top in some really laughable moments that rob the film
of its initial power. It is these moments that feel like the studio exerted its
influence by applying more conventional genre trappings, but fortunately the
film regains its composure somewhat during the climax.
SOURCES
Mills, Nancy. “Lady Beware Has Been This Director’s
Legacy.” Los Angeles Times. May 29, 1986.
Scott, Vernon. “Diane Lane
Ending Hiatus in Pittsburgh-Filmed Lady
Beware.” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. September 15, 1987.
Tiech, John. Pittsburgh Film History: On Set in the Steel
City. The History Press: Charleston. 2012.
Mr. Lafrance, your critique of this long-lost, almost uniformly neglected *and* rejected little gem is well appreciated! I went through several pieces — including a shockingly poorly written piece in the NY Times — before I found this review. Your thoroughness, obvious care in your subject matter, and careful balance of fact and personal points of opinion, are what I always aim to find in film critique — and seldom do, most specifically when it comes to evasive titles such as "Lady Beware." Thanks for the blog, which I will be certain to examine more closely. Your choices are particularly interesting, bordering on mystifying to the casual eye... then again, my eye tends towards the formal. Well done!
ReplyDeleteThank you for the kind words! It is such a shame that more people don't more about LADY BEWARE. It is quite the fascinating film that deserves to be rediscovered.
DeleteI doubt this film will ever get an official DVD release (or the original director's cut) but it's a good little movie, not a masterpiece but watchable and the acting is decent. Diane Lane and Michael Woods carry the film and do it well; I can't see Woods in anything else without thinking of the stalker he portrayed here. The locations are put to good use but you have to wonder what scenes were cut that director Karen Arthur felt would have added more to the film's plot. Definitely a guilty pleasure to a point, but it does address the crime of stalking which has become more prevalent in recent times.
ReplyDeleteI agree that I don't see this film getting a DVD release either. It isn't worth it financially for whoever owns it put in that kind of money for a film not many have seen or have any interest in seeing, sadly.
DeleteI would love to see Arthur's original cut as I'm sure it would've made for an even more interesting film but I do appreciate what's out there.
One of my favorite movies ever! Loved the creativity shown in the windows they put together for the movie. You're right, though, about it never being released on DVD. I've been hunting for a copy the last 20 years. Zip.
ReplyDeleteBut...I one owns a purchased VHS tape one can always have a movie ported over to DVD by a company who accomplishes such things.
Very true. And it shows up on Youtube as well so at least it can be seen.
DeleteI thought this might have been released on home video after Diane Lane's Oscar nomination for Unfaithful and her recent successes in the Zack Snyder 'Superman' movies and last years COVID hit 'Let Him Go'... but still no luck. I suspect it may be held up in legal wranglings with Scotti Brothers??? Great article though... Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThank you! Yeah, it's a shame that this movie hasn't been given a decent home video release. You may be right about the legal issues, which is a shame as I think Lane is excellent in it.
Delete