Expectations
for the cinematic adaptation of John Steinbeck’s famous novel Cannery Row were high. It marked the
directorial debut of David S. Ward, the Academy Award-winning screenwriter of The Sting (1973) and starred Nick Nolte
and Debra Winger. He was coming off the disappointing Heart Beat (1980) while she was fresh from the modestly successful Urban Cowboy (1980). However, Steinbeck
purists were upset that the film was a fusion of Cannery Row and its sequel Sweet Thursday with an emphasis on the latter, jettisoning the darker tone of the
former for a more upbeat vibe. The film’s image was tarnished by a highly
publicized lawsuit launched by Raquel Welch who had been fired after only five
days of filming and replaced by Winger.
Critics and
movie-going audiences were put off by the film’s stylized look (it was shot
mainly on two massive soundstages) and optimistic tone resulting in poor box
office results. However, time has been kind to this intriguing film, which has
aged surprisingly well, anchored by sweet, funny performances from Nolte and
Winger, and featuring incredibly detailed set design and absolutely gorgeous
cinematography. This hermetically-sealed world recalls
other stylized throwbacks to the classic Hollywood era fused with the Movie
Brat sensibility that came out around the same time, chief among them Martin
Scorsese’s New York, New York (1977)
and Francis Ford Coppola’s One from the
Heart (1982) that, like Cannery Row (1982),
were costly flops, but have enjoyed critical re-evaluation over the years with
the exception of the latter, which remains criminally overlooked.
After the
local fishing industry dried up and most of its denizens left, the remnants
hang on living their lives in their own eccentric ways. Take Doc (Nick Nolte)
for example. He’s a marine biologist that collects aquatic animals and sells
them off to colleges and museums to make ends meet. He’s friends with Mack (M. Emmet Walsh) and his fellow derelicts who have “no family, no money and no
ambition,” chief among them, Hazel (Frank McRae), the youngest and a man left
with the “slightly diminished capacity,” and “the mind of a small boy grafted
to the body of a bull,” as the wizened omniscient narrator (John Huston with a
voice made for voiceover narration) informs us. They’re a bunch of lovable,
grubby drunks, the kind that only exist in films of this sort.
Doc’s latest
project is collecting octopi and studying them with the hopes of writing and
then delivering a paper at the Congress of Marine Biologists in San Francisco.
He sees it as making a mark on society even if it’s “only a scribble.” I like
that the film takes the time to show him at work, wading in among the rocks
along the shore uncovering marine life to study and then back at his place
observing it all. Then, one day, Suzy (Debra Winger) comes into town looking
for work. She’s a beautiful young woman that catches Doc’s eye. Not finding
much luck at the local diner, she falls in with the prostitutes at the nearby
brothel and is mentored by Fauna (Audra Lindley), the woman who runs the place
and schools Suzy in their ways.
Pretty soon,
a turbulent romance develops between Doc and Suzy. Their initial meet-cute is
rather amusing as he suddenly gets tongue-tied around her, dazzled by her
beauty. The awkward way Nick Nolte plays it is quite funny. Debra Winger
matches him in adorable awkwardness as Suzy tells Doc a story about a guy she
once knew who constantly talked about ordering a beer milkshake at a drive-in,
but never did. The quirky little facial expression she gives at the end of
unsuccessfully telling the story is a nice bit of comedy that acts as visual
punctuation.
As he
demonstrated with North Dallas Forty
(1979), Nolte has a knack for comedy if given the right material. The scene
where he orders and then tries a beer milkshake is a nice bit of understated
comedy. The snappy exchanges of dialogue he has with Winger evoke old school
Hollywood comedies much better than the awful, forced attempt at such with the
later wannabe screwball comedy I Love
Trouble (1994). In that film, he had zero chemistry with leading lady Julia
Roberts. This is not the case with Winger in Cannery Row. Her and Nolte make for an unlikely romantic couple,
but they make it work and you can sense their chemistry right from Doc and
Suzy’s initial meeting by the way they look at each other. These characters are
classic opposites attract couple who get off on the wrong foot when they argue
over their respective lifestyles.
At this point
in her career, Winger was on the cusp of mainstream success when she suffered a
minor setback with the commercial and critical failure of this film. No matter,
she is very good in Cannery Row,
playing a fiercely independent woman who works long enough at the brothel so
that she has the money to get her own place. With her good looks and distinctive
scratchy voice, it is easy to see why Nolte’s Doc falls for Suzy’s scruffy
charms. The scene that cements it is when Doc sneaks into the brothel to
apologize to Suzy and they end up getting into another argument. During a lull,
a catchy Bob Crosby tune comes on and Doc challenges her to dance with him. She
puts on “In the Mood.” Their argument continues, but physically as they try to
impress each other with their dancing abilities. Winger, in particular,
impresses with her knack for physical comedy as Suzy repeatedly tries to pull
off the “Over the Rainbow” dance move. The repeated failed attempts look as
painful as they must’ve been for the actress, but she commits to it completely
every time. Now, that’s dedication.
Cannery Row is a stunning film to look at with
some frames composed like a something out of a painting. For example, there is
a sequence where Mack and the boys go on an expedition to capture a bunch of
frogs at night that is visually-arresting as it occurs during a full moon in a
fog-enshrouded marshland, which creates a distinctive atmosphere quickly offset
by several grown men leaping and splashing around like crazy. In addition, there
is a shot early on in the film of Suzy walking through Cannery Row and in the
background is a detailed matte painting showing the abandoned canneries against
a cloud-filled sky at dusk. The use of rear projection is glaringly obvious in
a few scenes, but this only adds to the stylized look of the film.
This is in
turn complimented by sets filled with incredible attention to period detail
that help flesh out this rich, colorful world. For example, later on in the
film, Suzy moves into a large, abandoned boiler, transforming it into a cozy
living space with her own hands and ingenuity. The finished product is an
inspired bit of set design. Much like, New
York, New York and One from the Heart,
Cannery Row was praised for its look
and criticized for being a failed experiment in style over substance. The
problem these films faced was that people were still riding the residual high
of the 1970s, which tended to champion gritty realism, breaking away from the
old studio system of filming on backlots. Mainstream audiences weren’t ready
for a throwback to that era and rejected what these filmmakers were trying to
do.
First
published in 1945, John Steinbeck’s Cannery
Row was considered a difficult novel to adapt, but screenwriter David S.
Ward found a way by combining it with the sequel Sweet Thursday. His screenplay for Cannery Row had made the rounds in Hollywood for three years and
had been turned down by every studio twice. Even though it was highly regarded,
the script didn’t follow the tried and true formula of a box office hit and
nobody wanted to risk $10 million on a first-time director.
Successful
movie producer Michael Phillips had worked on hits like The Sting and Close
Encounters of the Third Kind (1977), and wanted to give his best friend
Ward the opportunity to direct his script for Cannery Row. Ward had aspirations for the job, but his reputation
had been tarnished when several plagiarism suits were brought against him after
he won the Academy Award for The Sting.
The studio settled them out of court, but the whole experience left a bad taste
in his mouth. It took a year to acquire the film rights to both of Steinbeck’s novels,
costing $50,000.
While
developing Cannery Row, Ward pictured
Paul Newman as Doc. The actor was interested and made several rewrite
suggestions for the script, which Ward indulged for a year until Newman finally
said no. Several other movie stars, including Jack Nicholson, turned down the
role until one studio brought Nick Nolte on board. Nolte had wanted to play Doc
for years, but thought he was too young until he turned 40. By the fall of
1979, Phillips and Ward were ready to make the film with anyone, but continued
to hold out hope. This came in the form of then-new head of MGM David Begelman who
came across Ward’s script in January 1980. He was enticed by the well-written
script and the promise of Nolte as the lead. Known for being decisive, Begelman
gave it the greenlight with a budget of $10.6 million. It didn’t hurt that the
studio had a light schedule and he was looking for films to fill it.
Production
designer Richard MacDonald spent two months in Monterey to see if it was
feasible to shoot on location. It would have cost $2.5 million to restore the
area to the state of decay depicted in the novel. Also, local merchants
demanded sizable fees to shoot on their property. MacDonald concluded that the
film should be made on the MGM backlot. It took him months to convince Phillips
and Ward because backlot shooting had fallen out of fashion since the 1960s.
MacDonald knew that Stage 30 was ideal as it had been built over a giant water
tank and this would allow them to recreate the seaside town. He worked on a
stage plan and created stunning color sketches of sets that eventually
convinced Phillips and Ward to go that route. MacDonald hired a crew and sets
began to be constructed. For him, the benefits of shooting on a soundstage were
significant: “You can have whatever weather you want for however long you want.
It’s a tremendous advantage. You don’t have to wait for four minutes of sunset.
You can have sunset every day for a week.”
Phillips and
Ward gave Raquel Welch a copy of the script and she read for the role of Suzy.
The veteran actress was eager to prove that she could act and had been holding
out for the right part for three years. They were impressed with her passion
and Ward realized that he would have to rewrite the part because Welch was
considerably older than the character. He knew that to get the film made it
needed two recognizable lead actors. They had already considered Bo Derek, Liza
Minnelli and Olivia Newton-John. With time running out, they finally decided to
go with Welch. However, Begelman wanted her to do a nude scene, which not only
surprised her (she had never done one before), but also Phillips and Ward who
couldn’t recall such a scene in the script. Welch wanted to play the role so
much that she swallowed her pride and agreed to do it.
Principal
photography was scheduled to begin just after Labor Day, but the actors’ strike
occurred from July to October. MacDonald used this time to get the finest
craftsmen to build the sets, which included six working aquariums populated
with exotic fish, backdrops for ten bridges, a Victorian brothel, and a fully
stocked 1945-era grocery store. The high quality attention to detail attracted
top talent like Sven Nykvist, Ingmar Bergman’s regular cinematographer, and
editor David Bretherton, who won an Oscar for Cabaret (1972).
After the
first three weeks of principal photography, Welch was fired for breach of
contract. Some criticism labeled her a diva, which she denied, claiming that
during her time she never shot a major dialogue scene and was never used when
called. Ward admitted that Welch was a “casting mistake,” and “wasn’t
delivering a performance I could live with.” Welch argued if that was the case
then why didn’t the filmmakers realize it over the four weeks of
pre-production? The actress ended up suing MGM for more than $24 million for
breach of contract and eventually won.
If that
wasn’t bad enough, early on during filming, Ward was under pressure from the
studio when he fell behind schedule after the first week. Begelman felt that
Ward was directing too slowly and Nolte was out of shape and looked disheveled.
Doc was an ex-baseball player turned marine biologist and to prepare for the
role, Nolte took spring training with the California Angels. He also read all
of Steinbeck’s work, spent time with a marine biologist in order to gain
insight into his character, and even slept on the set one night a week. After
he was told to shape up, the actor went to the wardrobe department and put on a
man’s girdle and a pair of pants two sizes too big. When he showed up on set,
Phillips thought Nolte had lost weight.
Debra Winger
had originally read for the role of Suzy and been turned down much to her
disappointment. A few months later, after moving to New York City, she was
offered the part. She joined the production immediately and during the first
week she threw up so much that the actress lost eight pounds and suffered from
anxiety attacks. Winger took a cue from Nolte and also slept on the set several
times. A competitive spirit developed between the two that included pulling
pranks on each other.
Cannery Row received mixed to negative reviews
from critics that notably cited the exemplary work from production designer
Richard MacDonald and cinematographer Sven Nykvist. Roger Ebert gave it
two-and-a-half out of four stars and wrote, “And Nolte and Winger are almost
able to make their relationship work, if only it didn’t seem scripted out of
old country songs and lonely heart columns. It’s tough to pull of a movie like
this, in the semi-cynical 1980s.” In his review for The New York Times, Vincent Canby wrote, “Even Steinbeck’s errantly
sentimental fictions, however, deserve better than the awful fancies of this
film.” The Washington Post’s Gary Arnold
felt that it was “expendable and creaky, a lavishly mounted antique.” In his
review for the Globe and Mail, Jay
Scott wrote, “Ward has failed to find for the production a pictorial style, and
has allowed photographer Sven Nykvist’s camera to run away with its pretty self
– film as an act of visual masturbation.”
Cannery Row seems even more of an anomaly now,
but in a refreshing way. It is one of those rare films that features a
cinematic world I’d want to visit if I could. Ward and his collaborators have
created such a richly textured world, with its inviting diners and sun-kissed
rocky shore, and populated it with all kinds of vivid, colorful people. It’s a
rare comedy where you really feel like you’ve been on a journey with these
characters, seen them experience ups and downs, and come out on the other side
so that they are different then when we first met them. They say ignorance is
bliss so maybe Cannery Row works best
if you haven’t read Steinbeck’s novel and just let the film wash over you.
Filled with eccentric characters who live carefree lives, the film version has
little pretense towards reality and perhaps this is what turned off critics and
audiences back in the day, having just come out of the ‘70s, a decade populated
by realistic fare. Ward’s film is anything but that. There is also a kind of
good-natured innocence that permeates throughout that might not have appealed
to a more cynical age.
SOURCES
Harmetz,
Aljean. “His Hometown Now Likes John Steinbeck Better.” The New York Times.
February 9, 1982.
Orth,
Maureen. “The Gamblers of Cannery Row.”
Rolling Stone. April 2, 1981.
Stabiner,
Karen. “A Film Set Restores Steinbeck’s World.” The New York Times.
March 15, 1981.
Is it safe to say you are a fan of Nick Nolte? You keep bringing up all of these tremendous gems I need to see. Nolte is like a fine wine. I think I appreciate him more and more with age. Or am I the fine wine?
ReplyDeleteSeriously, this looks like a film worth checking out and how can you go wrong with Steinbeck as source material?
I often found some of John Sayles films (Matewan, Eight Men Out) had a Steinbeck-like quality.
Cheers J.D.
The Sci-Fi Fanatic:
ReplyDeleteYeah, you could say I'm a fan of Nolte's work. Heh. He has appeared in quite a few films I really admire now that I think about it.
Good call about the Steinbeckian influence on Sayles' films. I get that vibe as well.
J.D. - this film is in my top ten of all time (63 years). I will never forget the feeling that washed over me 15-20 minutes into viewing at the theater back then that, "this is a GREAT movie". Classical music, jazz, coastline and especially John Huston's voice. All that as a framework or canvas for the character development. Outstanding. I still watch my VHS. They only reason I still have a player!
ReplyDeleteI wonder if you have a source to find out where they shot the exterior of the roadside restaurant where he took her to dinner. I assume the interior shots were soundstage but I want to find that place if it still exists as part of a pilgrimage. Any help appreciated.
I don't know. I will have to check that out. I know they shot most if not all the film on sound stages... maybe a couple things for exterior shots? Good question!
DeleteI also share your admiration for this film. It is just so wonderful. So underrated.
Interesting read, I like your take on the film. Regarding Raquel Welch, it should be noted that she won her lawsuit against them. The jury found that the studio purposely made up the criticism of her so they could fire her without paying off her contract. Nevertheless, the firing pretty much marked the end of her film career.
ReplyDeleteThanks! And I'm glad you mentioned that she won the lawsuit. I had forgotten about that and it should be added. I'm glad she won even if it did mean the end of her mainstream career. Such a shame.
DeleteI know one of the actresses who played one of the fellow prostitutes alongside the character of Suzie. She said Welch was perfect for the part.
DeleteI believe that the monatary settlement involved a percentage of the gross and the studio buried the film in distribution in an effort to limit Ms. Welch's financial award. It is the reason why it hasn't been put into the DVD format. The movie industry never forgets and always punishes the star if it can. This movie is one of my all-time favorites.
ReplyDeleteDo you mean Blu-Ray because you can get it on DVD.
DeleteI believe you cite a lot of publicity folklore here. Raquel has a nude scene not in the script? Rear projection showing in some scenes? I notice you like the qualities of the novel and say they're in the film which was drastically changed from the books. Doc was never a baseball player and Blaidsdell, not Suzy, suggested he try a beer milkshake. The Seer and the Narrator interrupted the continuity and mood of the film to make the audience feel distant instead of relating to the characters.
ReplyDeleteThere are a lot of differences but I felt the film captured the spirit of both novels.
Delete