“Parody was never my intention. I wanted to
make a fairy tale, something that’s frightening as well as fun, but also an
adventure story.” – Roman Polanski
Fresh from psychological
thriller Cul-de-Sac (1966), filmmaker
Roman Polanski shifted gears with his next effort, the horror comedy The Fearless Vampire Killers (1967),
where he would meet, cast and fall in love with his second wife, Sharon Tate.
It saw the director in a playful mood – as if he was cheekily thumbing his nose
at the successful Hammer horror movies populated with beautiful, busty women,
bright red blood, and exotic Eastern European settings, usually filmed on a
set. He proceeded to turn many of these elements on their head. So much so that
distributor MGM decided to market the film as a farce and changed the title,
saddling it with the clunky addition, Or
Pardon Me, But Your Teeth Are in My Neck, as well as cutting several
minutes out. Over the years, the excised footage has been restored and the film
can be seen as it was originally intended.
“Deep in the heart of
Transylvania,” we meet Professor Abronsius (Jack MacGowran) and his assistant
Alfred (Polanski) as they hunt for vampires. It’s a cold night as they make
their way through a snowy landscape. Their sleigh is set upon briefly by a pack
of wild dogs that only Alfred seems to notice, which establishes a slightly
ominous tone. They arrive at a small village where Abronsius has to be thawed
out. As he and Alfred warm-up, the older man notices strings of garlic hanging
all over the inn and the nervous owner is afraid to mention the nearby castle –
their ultimate destination. While staying overnight, they encounter Sarah
(Tate), the innkeeper’s beautiful daughter, whom Alfred becomes fond of, and
hobbies include taking numerous baths.
Polanski creates an
off-kilter vibe during these scenes as he establishes the relationship between
Abronsius and Alfred and the goings-on in the inn, which they inadvertently get
mixed up in to comic effect. There’s a nice moment where Alfred charms Sarah by
making a snowman only to get hit with a snowball by some meddlesome local
children. Polanski gradually eases us into the main story by sprinkling little
moments of comedy among a study of the villagers as a hard-working,
superstitious lot.
Watching these early scenes
with Alfred and Sarah flirting with each other one can’t help but think about
how Polanski and Tate were falling in love with each other in real life. He was
no doubt captivated by her considerable beauty, and this is evident in the way
he films her, with close-ups that highlight her radiant face. It’s obvious that
the camera loved her.
Almost 25 minutes in and
Polanski masterfully orchestrates a riveting scene where, while taking a bath,
Sarah is attacked from above by Count von Krolock (Ferdy Mayne) that begins
with her noticing flakes of snow falling around her. Krolock appears and
savagely bites her neck. As she struggles desperately, Polanski shows the
splashing bath water drenching the nearby door, which an unsuspecting Alfred is
behind. It is a sudden, jarring attack that is very effective in shaking things
up after all the light comedy that came before it.
Another beautifully
orchestrated set piece, and the one that the film is most famous for, sees the
Count introduce Sarah as the latest addition to his undead “family” as the
other members partake in a minuet that is quite a sight to behold – ghouls
pretending to be aristocrats – while our heroes attempt to masquerade as one of
them. It is a sequence that best typifies the film as a whole – the deft
marriage of horror and comedy. It’s a tricky balancing act that Polanski
maintains throughout. Unlike a lot of horror movies, he doesn’t wallpaper the
film with scary music. He uses it judiciously and knows when silence, like when
the vampire hunters sneak into the Count’s castle, is more suspenseful with
just sound effects.
Abronsius is a methodical,
wise old man but also physically frail, and Alfred is his bumbling, timid
apprentice. They are hardly the heroic, able-bodied men of action like
swashbuckler Captain Kronos in the film of the same name, but that’s the point
of The Fearless Vampire Killers as
Polanski deliberately goes against this convention for laughs. Jack MacGowran
and Polanski play well off each other with the former trying to teach his
assistant the ways to detect and kill vampires because he is getting too old
physically, while the latter is too clumsy to do the job, stumbling over each
other, bumping into things and generally being inept. They have their moments
of competency, though, like when Alfred gracefully skis down the snow-covered
countryside in pursuit of a newly turned bloodsucker.
The idea for The Fearless Vampire Killers came to
Roman Polanski while on a skiing vacation in Austria during post-production on Cul-de-Sac. He and his co-writer Gerard
Brach had been thinking about making a “vampire spoof” for some time. Polanski
remembered seeing horror movies in Paris and audiences laughing at them. He
said, “Why not make a film they could laugh with, rather than at?” He also
wanted to eschew the “tatty rural location situated conveniently near a film
studio,” for “swaths of frosted pine trees, massive snowdrifts, and majestic
mountain peaks.”
Accompanying Polanski on this
trip was his producing partner Gene Gutowski. As they were putting the
finishing touches on Cul-de-Sac, the
latter met with American producer Martin Ransohoff, joint head of Filmways, a
production company financed by and had a distribution deal with MGM. He liked Cul-de-Sac and agreed to distribute it
in the United States. He also wanted to work with Polanski and Gutowski on
their next project, then-entitled, The
Vampire Killers.
Ransohoff had a reputation
for clashing with filmmakers and Polanski was no different. The director wanted
to cast Jill St. John in the role of Sarah because he envisioned the character
as a redhead, but the producer wanted Sharon Tate, a young actress he had been
grooming for stardom. Polanski felt that she didn’t look Jewish enough for the
role but finally agreed to do a screen test with her. Once he saw Tate in a red
wig and her character’s costume, he was convinced that she was right for the
role.
Polanski wanted to cast
himself in the co-lead role of Alfred but neither Gutowski or Ransohoff thought
he was right for the part and were concerned that he wouldn’t be able to juggle
double duty as director and actor. Polanski had experience as an actor and to
appease his producers did a screen test. Co-head of Filmways, John Calley, was
convinced and pressed his business partner to go with the choice.
Gutowski scouted locations
and found an Austrian castle in a snowbound area in Northeastern Italy. The production
was all set to film there but a day before they were to fly out an unexpected
change in weather caused all the snow to melt! The production scrambled to find
another suitable location and settled on a snowy plateau near an Italian ski
resort. There was no castle and so sets would have to be built at the studio
for an additional cost, causing the budget to increase from $1 million to $2
million.
Filming lasted five months
and had its share of difficulties. Principal photography took place in a snowy
environment and the crew had to haul heavy equipment through the snow over long
distances every day. After shooting there, the production moved to the confines
of the studio backlot in England. Due to the late start in filming, their time
was limited because Stanley Kubrick’s
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) was taking up a lot of studio space. As a
result, the production moved to nearby Elstree Studios.
Ransohoff did not like the
time it took for principal photography to be completed or the number of takes
Polanski would do – sometimes over 40 for a given scene but Gutowski defended
his friend’s methods. The lengthy shoot, coupled with a busy shooting schedule
at Elstree, forced the production to move yet again to Pinewood Studios.
Polanski finished his rough
cut and then showed it to Ransohoff and Calley in Los Angeles. Ransohoff didn’t
like it and told Polanski that it was too long and needed to be reworked, which
was his right contractually as the studio could cut their own version in North
America while the director could release his own version internationally. After
he went off to make Rosemary’s Baby
(1968), Polanski had a chance to see the version with Ransohoff’s changes and
was horrified to find that he changed the title to Pardon Me, But Your Teeth Are in My Neck, redubbed all the actors
so they would sound more American, tweaked the score, and cut 20 minutes out.
Understandably upset, Polanski said at the time, “I’ve called them and asked
them to have my name removed because I don’t want credit for a film I didn’t
really make. The one now showing is far from the one I filmed.”
In addition, the truncated
version received negative critical notices and MGM cut their losses, barely
giving it a theatrical release. It didn’t screen in L.A. until almost a year
later at midnight showings. Polanski’s film did find a second life at regional
college film societies all over the country that rented 16mm copies of it due
his rising popularity with the success of Rosemary’s
Baby.
While the film’s humor is
hardly subtle – it relies a lot on physical gaffs – it isn’t quite as broadly
slapstick as, say, Young Frankenstein
(1974). The Fearless Vampire Killers
has the occasional moments of dread. It was an approach that Polanski would
apply again in the underrated supernatural thriller The Ninth Gate (1999). The film ends in a fashion that is
consistent with many of the filmmaker’s other efforts: pessimistically as
Alfred’s love for Sarah proves to be his last inept act that he is unable to
bumble his way out of thereby dooming humanity, much like the ill-fated
protagonists in Rosemary’s Baby and Chinatown (1974). As Glenn Erickson put
it so well in a review, the ending shows “the ineffectualness of virtue in the
face of organized evil.”
SOURCES
Nuiman, Philip and
Constantine Nasr. “Dancing with Vampires: Roman Polanski’s Homage to Fangs,
Fairy Tales and Fearless Vampire Killers.”
Little Shoppe of Horrors. October 2011.
I thought this was a pretty good film. It's funny and also has some style as it shows Polanski can do comedy and have some fun.
ReplyDeleteIt does. I really like this film. It has a playfulness to it that I dig.
Delete