Early on in the film, Bill Murray's character, Grimm (a self-reflective nod to his character’s attitude towards the city) remarks, "God, I hate this town." It is an often repeated line that nicely establishes the scornful tone of the film that begins when
Murray, dressed as a clown, robs a bank in downtown . After escaping with his cohorts, Phylis (Geena Davis) and Loomis (Randy Quaid), it becomes readily apparent that Grimm is tired of Manhattan and that this well-crafted heist and the subsequent getaway is the big kiss-off to the town he hates the most. However, New York City does not want to relinquish its hold on Grimm and his gang so soon, and a series of events conspire to delay their escape. It does not help that they are pursued by a persistent, veteran cop (Jason Robards) who makes it his life’s mission to track them down. New York City
The first third of Quick Change — the bank heist — is the best part of the film. It is a brilliant starting point that demonstrates Bill Murray at his smart-ass best. He gleefully fools and infuriates both the cops, the media, and even the hostages with his flippant attitude. His disposition is understandable when juxtaposed with the media circus that occurs outside the bank. Curiosity seekers and the media, smelling a potential story, flock to the scene. Even hot dog vendors race each other for the best vantage point to hock their wares. Everybody is looking to exploit the situation in some fashion and this makes the desire for Grimm, Phylis and Loomis to succeed all the more significant.
However, for all the comic ingenuousness of the opening scene, Quick Change begins to slowly unravel as the trio attempt to leave
and encounter more and more absurd situations that gradually escalate to unrealistic proportions. What makes these circumstances nonsensical is the ease that New York City 's character is able to conveniently resolve them. The filmmakers should have stuck to showing Murray with its annoying denizens and inhabitants that worked so well in the first third of the picture. It is not that the rest of the film is bad necessarily, it is just that it comes as a let down after such an excellent beginning. New York City
There's such a sense of incompleteness about a movie: You feel it as an actor delivering funny lines, and you feel it especially as a director: You tell the joke in June of 1988, and you have to wait two years to get the laugh. It's 1990, and I'm still waiting for the laugh.
This feeling is what may have motivated
to take more control on Quick Change. In addition to starring, he also co-produced and co-directed (screenwriter Howard Franklin also co-directed) the movie. Murray
Where his contemporaries like Steve Martin and Chevy Chase have softened their edge over time (see Father of the Bride and Cops and Robbersons respectively),
seems to get more and more acerbic with every film. He had not been that good since he did Ghostbusters way back in 1984. Murray
The rest of the cast supports
's antics brilliantly. Geena Davis showed with Beetlejuice (1988) that she had the capacity to be a wonderful comedic actor and she proves it once again as Murray 's lover and partner in crime who also harbors a secret that threatens to consume her. Randy Quaid is at his hysterical best during the first third of the film, but his dumb guy shtick soon gets tiresome. It seems that the National Lampoon's Vacation films threaten to forever typecast him as a lunkhead. I hope for his sake that this is not the case. This leaves Jason Robards to play the straight man of the picture. He fills these shoes admirably as the detective who, like Murray Murray's character, is tired of and all of its eccentricities. But something, perhaps a sense of duty, keeps him going and determined to catch the robbers if it is the last thing he ever does. New York City
The constant supply of comical cameos keeps the rest of the film watchable. The always entertaining Phil Hartman appears as an anxiety-ridden Yuppie who holds the trio at gunpoint when he mistakenly thinks that they are breaking into his new apartment. The scene is a great battle of talents as he and Murray square off against each other. Tony Shalhoub makes an appearance as a hopelessly incoherent foreign taxi cab driver who delays the robbers from escaping the city. Shalhoub demonstrated once again that his comedic talents were being wasted on the Wings TV show and that his strengths lie in role like this one and his performance as a jaded
Hollywood producer in Barton Fink (1991).
Bill Murray had high hopes for Quick Change. As he said in an interview, "everyone will enjoy this movie. But New Yorkers will enjoy it especially because they know how bad their city really is." Sadly, the film disappeared rather quickly upon its release. Perhaps its cynical view of
was too much for mainstream tastes. It is too bad because this is quite an entertaining film that only suffers from a weak ending, but is also filled with exceptional performances — especially that of Murray's who is finally given some room to showcase his comedic talents — something that he was not able to do at that time (although, Scrooged featured a tour-de-force performance by Murray). Watching Quick Change reminds one of his vintage roles in the aforementioned Ghostbusters and Stripes (1981), and shows that he has a legitimate shot at becoming a director. Let's hope his next directorial effort is without a chaperon. New York City
Just finally caught up with this one after all these years on an HD broadcast. I love these kinds of all-in-one-night movies--some of the best seem to take place in NY. Very entertaining although I did note some inconsistencies in tone and pacing, most likely due to the inexperience of novice directors Franklin and Murray.ReplyDelete
DVD Savant mentions in his review that Jonathan Demme was the original director of the film, but pulled out at some point close to production (to work on SILENCE OF THE LAMBS?). Based on Demme's oeuvre, he is a good choice for the material and I can't help but think that his departure happened rather late in the process--Jack Gilpin, so good as a yuppie cohort of Jeff Daniels in SOMETHING WILD, is the obnoxious yuppie who bargains with his watch; Robards had previously appeared in Demme's MELVIN AND HOWARD as Howard Hughes and was later in Demme's PHILADELPHIA. A lot of the peripheral characters and details, the working class ones in particular, are reminiscent of Demme's work.
That's interesting. I did not know that Demme was originally attached but now that you mention it, it is the kinda film that he might have done. I'm curious to know how it might've turned out but I thought Murray and co. did a pretty decent job. As I said, the last third of the film feels week but I think that was more a script issue.
This is very interesting... really cool...enjoying it...ReplyDelete
Thank you very much...
#1 Satellite Television Service Provider
This is very informative interesting site.Personally i like it.ReplyDelete
I can't help but think that his departure happened rather late in the process--Jack Gilpin, so good as a yuppie cohort of Jeff Daniels in SOMETHING WILD, is the obnoxious yuppie who bargains with his watch; Robards had previously appeared in Demme's MELVIN AND HOWARD as Howard Hughes and was later in Demme's PHILADELPHIA.ReplyDelete
San Diego MLS